The cruft pack feature has two primary test scripts which exercise
various parts of it, which are:
- t5329-pack-objects-cruft.sh
- t7704-repack-cruft.sh
The former is designed to test low-level pack generation mechanics at
the 'git pack-objects --cruft'-level, which is plumbing. The latter, on
the other hand, is designed to test the user-facing behavior through
'git repack --cruft', which is porcelain (under the "ancillary
manipulators" sub-section).
At some point a handful of tests which should have been added to the
latter script were instead written to the former. This isn't a huge
deal, but rectifying it is straightforward. Move a handful of
'repack'-related tests out of t5329 and into their rightful home in
t7704.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Once an object is written into a cruft pack, we can only freshen it by
writing a new loose or packed copy of that object with a more recent
mtime.
Prior to 61568efa95 (builtin/pack-objects.c: support `--max-pack-size`
with `--cruft`, 2023-08-28), we typically had at most one cruft pack in
a repository at any given time. So freshening unreachable objects was
straightforward when already rewriting the cruft pack (and its *.mtimes
file).
But 61568efa95 changes things: 'pack-objects' now supports writing
multiple cruft packs when invoked with `--cruft` and the
`--max-pack-size` flag. Cruft packs are rewritten until they reach some
size threshold, at which point they are considered "frozen", and will
only be modified in a pruning GC, or if the threshold itself is
adjusted.
Prior to this patch, however, this process breaks down when we attempt
to freshen an object packed in an earlier cruft pack, and that cruft
pack is larger than the threshold and thus will survive the repack.
When this is the case, it is impossible to freshen objects in cruft
pack(s) when those cruft packs are larger than the threshold. This is
because we would avoid writing them in the new cruft pack entirely, for
a couple of reasons.
1. When enumerating packed objects via 'add_objects_in_unpacked_packs()'
we pass the SKIP_IN_CORE_KEPT_PACKS, which is used to avoid looping
over the packs we're going to retain (which are marked as kept
in-core by 'read_cruft_objects()').
This means that we will avoid enumerating additional packed copies
of objects found in any cruft packs which are larger than the given
size threshold. Thus there is no opportunity to call
'create_object_entry()' whatsoever.
2. We likewise will discard the loose copy (if one exists) of any
unreachable object packed in a cruft pack that is larger than the
threshold. Here our call path is 'add_unreachable_loose_objects()',
which uses the 'add_loose_object()' callback.
That function will eventually land us in 'want_object_in_pack()'
(via 'add_cruft_object_entry()'), and we'll discard the object as it
appears in one of the packs which we marked as kept in-core.
This means in effect that it is impossible to freshen an unreachable
object once it appears in a cruft pack larger than the given threshold.
Instead, we should pack an additional copy of an unreachable object we
want to freshen even if it appears in a cruft pack, provided that the
cruft copy has an mtime which is before the mtime of the copy we are
trying to pack/freshen. This is sub-optimal in the sense that it
requires keeping an additional copy of unreachable objects upon
freshening, but we don't have a better alternative without the ability
to make in-place modifications to existing *.mtimes files.
In order to implement this, we have to adjust the behavior of
'want_found_object()'. When 'pack-objects' is told that we're *not*
going to retain any cruft packs (i.e. the set of packs marked as kept
in-core does not contain a cruft pack), the behavior is unchanged.
But when there *is* at least one cruft pack that we're holding onto, it
is no longer sufficient to reject a copy of an object found in that
cruft pack for that reason alone. In this case, we only want to reject a
candidate object when copies of that object either:
- exists in a non-cruft pack that we are retaining, regardless of that
pack's mtime, or
- exists in a cruft pack with an mtime at least as recent as the copy
we are debating whether or not to pack, in which case freshening
would be redundant.
To do this, keep track of whether or not we have any cruft packs in our
in-core kept list with a new 'ignore_packed_keep_in_core_has_cruft'
flag. When we end up in this new special case, we replace a call to
'has_object_kept_pack()' to 'want_cruft_object_mtime()', and only reject
objects when we have a copy in an existing cruft pack with at least as
recent an mtime as our candidate (in which case "freshening" would be
redundant).
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git version --build-options" stopped showing zlib version by
mistake due to recent refactoring, which has been corrected.
* tc/zlib-ng-fix:
help: print zlib-ng version number
help: include git-zlib.h to print zlib version
Commit bc26f7690a (clone: make it possible to specify --tags,
2025-02-06) added a new paragraph in the middle of this list item. By
adding an empty line rather than using a list continuation, we broke the
list continuation, with the new paragraph ending up funnily indented.
Restore the chain of list continuations.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Update for 2.49.0.
- Fix numerous typos found by spelling checker.
- Fix more straight quotes.
- Harmonize translation of "blob" (to "blob", not "blobb").
- Harmonize translation of "reflog" (to "referenslogg").
Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
In 3f763ddf28 (fetch: set remote/HEAD if it does not exist, 2024-11-22),
unconditionally adds "HEAD" to the list of ref prefixes we send to the
server.
This breaks a core assumption that the list of prefixes we send to the
server is complete. We must either send all prefixes we care about, or
none at all (in the latter case the server then advertises everything).
The tag following code is careful to only add "refs/tags/" to the list
of prefixes if there are already entries in the prefix list. But because
the new code from 3f763ddf28 runs after the tag code, and because it
unconditionally adds to the prefix list, we may end up with a prefix
list that _should_ have "refs/tags/" in it, but doesn't.
When that is the case, the server does not advertise any tags, and our
auto-following breaks because we never learned about any tags in the
first place.
Fix this by only adding "HEAD" to the ref prefixes when we know that we
are already limiting the advertisement. In either case we'll learn about
HEAD (either through the limited advertisement, or implicitly through a
full advertisement).
Reported-by: Igor Todorovski <itodorov@ca.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When building against zlib-ng, the header file `zlib.h` is not included,
but `zlib-ng.h` is included instead. It's `zlib.h` that defines
`ZLIB_VERSION` and that macro is used to print out zlib version in
`git-version(1)` with `--build-options`. But when it's not defined, no
version is printed.
`zlib-ng.h` defines another macro: `ZLIBNG_VERSION`. Use that macro to
print the zlib-ng version in `git version --build-options` when it's
set. Otherwise fallback to `ZLIB_VERSION`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 41f1a8435a (git-compat-util: move include of "compat/zlib.h" into
"git-zlib.h", 2025-01-28) some code was refactored to enable easier
linking against zlib-ng.
This removed `zlib.h` being indirectly included in `help.c`. As this
file uses `ZLIB_VERSION` to print the version number of zlib when
running git-version(1) with `--build-options`, this resulted in a
regression.
Include `git-zlib.h` directly into `help.c` to print zlib version
information. This brings back the zlib version in the output of
`git version --build-options`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hotfix to help building Git-for-Windows.
* js/win-2.49-build-fixes:
cmake: generalize the handling of the `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` list
meson: fix sorting
ident: stop assuming that `gw_gecos` is writable
Some future breaking changes would remove certain parts of the
default repository, which were still described even when the
documents were built for the future with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES.
* pw/repo-layout-doc-update:
docs: fix repository-layout when building with breaking changes
A late-comer to the v2.49.0 party, `sk/unit-test-oid`, added yet another
array item to `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`, causing the `win+VS build` job to fail
with symptoms like this one:
unit-tests-lib.lib(u-oid-array.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved
external symbol cl_parse_any_oid referenced in function fill_array
This is a similar scenario to the one that forced me to write
8afda42fce (cmake: generalize the handling of the `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`
list, 2024-09-18): The hard-coded echo of `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` in
`CMakeLists.txt` that recapitulates faithfully what was already
hard-coded in `Makefile` would either have to be updated whack-a-mole
style, or generalized.
Just like I chose the latter option for `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`, I now do the
same for `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 904339edbd (Introduce support for the Meson build system,
2024-12-06) the `meson.build` file was introduced, adding also a
Windows-specific list of source files. This list was obviously meant to
be sorted alphabetically, but there is one mistake. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 590e081dea (ident: add NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT for systems without
pw_gecos in struct passwd, 2011-05-19), code was introduced to iterate
over the `gw_gecos` field; The loop variable is of type `char *`, which
assumes that `gw_gecos` is writable.
However, it is not necessarily writable (and it is a bad idea to have it
writable in the first place), so let's switch the loop variable type to
`const char *`.
This is not a new problem, but what is new is the Meson build. While it
does not trigger in CI builds, imitating the commands of
`ci/run-build-and-tests.sh` in a regular Git for Windows SDK (`meson
setup build . --fatal-meson-warnings --warnlevel 2 --werror --wrap-mode
nofallback -Dfuzzers=true` followed by `meson compile -C build --`
results in this beautiful error:
"cc" [...] -o libgit.a.p/ident.c.obj "-c" ../ident.c
../ident.c: In function 'copy_gecos':
../ident.c:68:18: error: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
68 | for (src = get_gecos(w); *src && *src != ','; src++) {
| ^
cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
Now, why does this not trigger in CI? The answer is as simple as it is
puzzling: The `win+Meson` job completely side-steps Git for Windows'
development environment, opting instead to use the GCC that is on the
`PATH` in GitHub-hosted `windows-latest` runners. That GCC is pinned to
v12.2.0 and targets the UCRT (unlikely to change any time soon, see
https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/win25/20250303.1/images/windows/toolsets/toolset-2022.json#L132-L141).
That is in stark contrast to Git for Windows, which uses GCC v14.2.0 and
targets MSVCRT. Git for Windows' `Makefile`-based build also obviously
uses different compiler flags, otherwise this compile error would have
had plenty of opportunity in almost 14 years to surface.
In other words, contrary to my expectations, the `win+Meson` job is
ill-equipped to replace the `win build` job because it exercises a
completely different tool version/compiler flags vector than what Git
for Windows needs.
Nevertheless, there is currently this huge push, including breaking
changes after -rc1 and all, for switching to Meson. Therefore, we need
to make it work, somehow, even in Git for Windows' SDK, hence this
patch, at this point in time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Meson-based build procedure forgot to build some docs, which has
been corrected.
* pw/build-meson-technical-and-howto-docs:
meson: fix building technical and howto docs
The editorconfig file is updated to tell us that bash scripts are
similar to general Bourne shell scripts.
* dm/editorconfig-bash-is-like-sh:
editorconfig: add .bash extension
Convert a few unit tests to the clar framework.
* sk/unit-test-oid:
t/unit-tests: convert oidtree test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: convert oidmap test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: convert oid-array test to use clar test framework
t/unit-tests: implement clar specific oid helper functions
