In my setup, clang finds `/usr/local/cuda` and hence the output of
`clang -v` ends with this line:
Found CUDA installation: /usr/local/cuda, version
This confuses the `detect-compiler` script because it matches _all_
lines that contain the needle "version" surrounded by spaces. As a
consequence, the `get_family` function returns two lines: "Ubuntu clang"
and above-mentioned line, which the `case` statement does not handle
well and hence reports "unknown compiler family" instead of the expected
set of "clang14", "clang13", ..., "clang1" output.
Let's unconfuse the script by letting it parse the first matching line
and ignore the rest.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When compiling Git using `clang`, the `-Wcomma` option can be used to
warn about code using the comma operator (because it is typically
unintentional and wants to use the semicolon instead).
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. That is why the
`-Wcomma` option of clang was introduced: To identify unintentional uses
of the comma operator.
In the `compat/regex/` code, the comma operator is used twice, once to
avoid surrounding two conditional statements with curly brackets, the
other one to increment two counters simultaneously in a `do ... while`
condition.
The first one is replaced with a proper conditional block, surrounded by
curly brackets.
The second one would be harder to replace because the loop contains two
`continue`s. Therefore, the second one is marked as intentional by
casting the value-to-discard to `void`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. That is why the
`-Wcomma` option of clang was introduced: To identify unintentional uses
of the comma operator.
In this instance, the usage is intentional because it allows storing the
value of the current character as `prev_ch` before making the next
character the current one, all of which happens in the loop condition
that lets the loop stop at a closing bracket.
However, it is hard to read.
The chosen alternative to using the comma operator is to move those
assignments from the condition into the loop body; In this particular
case that requires special care because the loop body contains a
`continue` for the case where a character class is found that starts
with `[:` but does not end in `:]` (and the assignments should occur
even when that code path is taken), which needs to be turned into a
`goto`.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. That is why the
`-Wcomma` option of clang was introduced: To identify unintentional uses
of the comma operator.
Intentional uses include situations where one wants to avoid curly
brackets around multiple statements that need to be guarded by a
condition. This is the case here, as the repetitive nature of the
statements is easier to see for a human reader this way. At least in my
opinion.
However, opinions on this differ wildly, take 10 people and you have 10
different preferences.
On the Git mailing list, it seems that the consensus is to use the long
form instead, so let's do just that.
Suggested-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. While the code in
this patch used the comma operator intentionally (to avoid curly
brackets around two statements, each, that want to be guarded by a
condition), it is better to surround it with curly brackets and to use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. In this instance, it
makes the code harder to read than necessary, too. Better use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. Better use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. Better use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comma operator is a somewhat obscure C feature that is often used by
mistake and can even cause unintentional code flow. Better use a
semicolon instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git version --build-options" stopped showing zlib version by
mistake due to recent refactoring, which has been corrected.
* tc/zlib-ng-fix:
help: print zlib-ng version number
help: include git-zlib.h to print zlib version
Commit bc26f7690a (clone: make it possible to specify --tags,
2025-02-06) added a new paragraph in the middle of this list item. By
adding an empty line rather than using a list continuation, we broke the
list continuation, with the new paragraph ending up funnily indented.
Restore the chain of list continuations.
Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Update for 2.49.0.
- Fix numerous typos found by spelling checker.
- Fix more straight quotes.
- Harmonize translation of "blob" (to "blob", not "blobb").
- Harmonize translation of "reflog" (to "referenslogg").
Signed-off-by: Peter Krefting <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
In 3f763ddf28 (fetch: set remote/HEAD if it does not exist, 2024-11-22),
unconditionally adds "HEAD" to the list of ref prefixes we send to the
server.
This breaks a core assumption that the list of prefixes we send to the
server is complete. We must either send all prefixes we care about, or
none at all (in the latter case the server then advertises everything).
The tag following code is careful to only add "refs/tags/" to the list
of prefixes if there are already entries in the prefix list. But because
the new code from 3f763ddf28 runs after the tag code, and because it
unconditionally adds to the prefix list, we may end up with a prefix
list that _should_ have "refs/tags/" in it, but doesn't.
When that is the case, the server does not advertise any tags, and our
auto-following breaks because we never learned about any tags in the
first place.
Fix this by only adding "HEAD" to the ref prefixes when we know that we
are already limiting the advertisement. In either case we'll learn about
HEAD (either through the limited advertisement, or implicitly through a
full advertisement).
Reported-by: Igor Todorovski <itodorov@ca.ibm.com>
Co-authored-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When building against zlib-ng, the header file `zlib.h` is not included,
but `zlib-ng.h` is included instead. It's `zlib.h` that defines
`ZLIB_VERSION` and that macro is used to print out zlib version in
`git-version(1)` with `--build-options`. But when it's not defined, no
version is printed.
`zlib-ng.h` defines another macro: `ZLIBNG_VERSION`. Use that macro to
print the zlib-ng version in `git version --build-options` when it's
set. Otherwise fallback to `ZLIB_VERSION`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Helped-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 41f1a8435a (git-compat-util: move include of "compat/zlib.h" into
"git-zlib.h", 2025-01-28) some code was refactored to enable easier
linking against zlib-ng.
This removed `zlib.h` being indirectly included in `help.c`. As this
file uses `ZLIB_VERSION` to print the version number of zlib when
running git-version(1) with `--build-options`, this resulted in a
regression.
Include `git-zlib.h` directly into `help.c` to print zlib version
information. This brings back the zlib version in the output of
`git version --build-options`.
Signed-off-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Hotfix to help building Git-for-Windows.
* js/win-2.49-build-fixes:
cmake: generalize the handling of the `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` list
meson: fix sorting
ident: stop assuming that `gw_gecos` is writable
Some future breaking changes would remove certain parts of the
default repository, which were still described even when the
documents were built for the future with WITH_BREAKING_CHANGES.
* pw/repo-layout-doc-update:
docs: fix repository-layout when building with breaking changes
A late-comer to the v2.49.0 party, `sk/unit-test-oid`, added yet another
array item to `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`, causing the `win+VS build` job to fail
with symptoms like this one:
unit-tests-lib.lib(u-oid-array.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved
external symbol cl_parse_any_oid referenced in function fill_array
This is a similar scenario to the one that forced me to write
8afda42fce (cmake: generalize the handling of the `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`
list, 2024-09-18): The hard-coded echo of `CLAR_TEST_OBJS` in
`CMakeLists.txt` that recapitulates faithfully what was already
hard-coded in `Makefile` would either have to be updated whack-a-mole
style, or generalized.
Just like I chose the latter option for `UNIT_TEST_OBJS`, I now do the
same for `CLAR_TEST_OBJS`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 904339edbd (Introduce support for the Meson build system,
2024-12-06) the `meson.build` file was introduced, adding also a
Windows-specific list of source files. This list was obviously meant to
be sorted alphabetically, but there is one mistake. Let's fix that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 590e081dea (ident: add NO_GECOS_IN_PWENT for systems without
pw_gecos in struct passwd, 2011-05-19), code was introduced to iterate
over the `gw_gecos` field; The loop variable is of type `char *`, which
assumes that `gw_gecos` is writable.
However, it is not necessarily writable (and it is a bad idea to have it
writable in the first place), so let's switch the loop variable type to
`const char *`.
This is not a new problem, but what is new is the Meson build. While it
does not trigger in CI builds, imitating the commands of
`ci/run-build-and-tests.sh` in a regular Git for Windows SDK (`meson
setup build . --fatal-meson-warnings --warnlevel 2 --werror --wrap-mode
nofallback -Dfuzzers=true` followed by `meson compile -C build --`
results in this beautiful error:
"cc" [...] -o libgit.a.p/ident.c.obj "-c" ../ident.c
../ident.c: In function 'copy_gecos':
../ident.c:68:18: error: assignment discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
68 | for (src = get_gecos(w); *src && *src != ','; src++) {
| ^
cc1.exe: all warnings being treated as errors
Now, why does this not trigger in CI? The answer is as simple as it is
puzzling: The `win+Meson` job completely side-steps Git for Windows'
development environment, opting instead to use the GCC that is on the
`PATH` in GitHub-hosted `windows-latest` runners. That GCC is pinned to
v12.2.0 and targets the UCRT (unlikely to change any time soon, see
https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/win25/20250303.1/images/windows/toolsets/toolset-2022.json#L132-L141).
That is in stark contrast to Git for Windows, which uses GCC v14.2.0 and
targets MSVCRT. Git for Windows' `Makefile`-based build also obviously
uses different compiler flags, otherwise this compile error would have
had plenty of opportunity in almost 14 years to surface.
In other words, contrary to my expectations, the `win+Meson` job is
ill-equipped to replace the `win build` job because it exercises a
completely different tool version/compiler flags vector than what Git
for Windows needs.
Nevertheless, there is currently this huge push, including breaking
changes after -rc1 and all, for switching to Meson. Therefore, we need
to make it work, somehow, even in Git for Windows' SDK, hence this
patch, at this point in time.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
