Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason d0e624aed7 cocci: run against a generated ALL.cocci
The preceding commits to make the "coccicheck" target incremental made
it slower in some cases. As an optimization let's not have the
many=many mapping of <*.cocci>=<*.[ch]>, but instead concat the
<*.cocci> into an ALL.cocci, and then run one-to-many
ALL.cocci=<*.[ch]>.

A "make coccicheck" is now around 2x as fast as it was on "master",
and around 1.5x as fast as the preceding change to make the run
incremental:

	$ git hyperfine -L rev origin/master,HEAD~,HEAD -p 'make clean' 'make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' -r 3
	Benchmark 1: make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'origin/master
	  Time (mean ± σ):      4.258 s ±  0.015 s    [User: 27.432 s, System: 1.532 s]
	  Range (min … max):    4.241 s …  4.268 s    3 runs

	Benchmark 2: make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'HEAD~
	  Time (mean ± σ):      5.365 s ±  0.079 s    [User: 36.899 s, System: 1.810 s]
	  Range (min … max):    5.281 s …  5.436 s    3 runs

	Benchmark 3: make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'HEAD
	  Time (mean ± σ):      2.725 s ±  0.063 s    [User: 14.796 s, System: 0.233 s]
	  Range (min … max):    2.667 s …  2.792 s    3 runs

	Summary
	  'make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'HEAD' ran
	    1.56 ± 0.04 times faster than 'make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'origin/master'
	    1.97 ± 0.05 times faster than 'make coccicheck SPATCH=spatch COCCI_SOURCES="$(echo $(ls o*.c builtin/h*.c))"' in 'HEAD~'

This can be turned off with SPATCH_CONCAT_COCCI, but as the
beneficiaries of "SPATCH_CONCAT_COCCI=" would mainly be those
developing the *.cocci rules themselves, let's leave this optimization
on by default.

For more information see my "Optimizing *.cocci rules by concat'ing
them" (<220901.8635dbjfko.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>) on the
cocci@inria.fr mailing list.

This potentially changes the results of our *.cocci rules, but as
noted in that discussion it should be safe for our use. We don't name
rules, or if we do their names don't conflict across our *.cocci
files.

To the extent that we'd have any inter-dependencies between rules this
doesn't make that worse, as we'd have them now if we ran "make
coccicheck", applied the results, and would then have (due to
hypothetical interdependencies) suggested changes on the subsequent
"make coccicheck".

Our "coccicheck-test" target makes use of the ALL.cocci when running
tests, e.g. when testing unused.{c,out} we test it against ALL.cocci,
not unused.cocci. We thus assert (to the extent that we have test
coverage) that this concatenation doesn't change the expected results
of running these rules.

Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
2022-11-02 21:22:16 -04:00
2022-08-29 14:55:12 -07:00
2022-08-30 10:27:16 -07:00
2022-07-10 14:43:34 -07:00
2022-08-29 14:55:15 -07:00
2022-08-03 13:36:09 -07:00
2022-08-03 13:36:09 -07:00
2022-07-14 15:08:29 -07:00
2022-05-10 17:41:10 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-07-19 12:45:31 -07:00
2022-07-18 13:31:57 -07:00
2022-03-28 10:25:52 -07:00
2022-08-30 10:22:10 -07:00
2022-07-10 14:43:34 -07:00
2022-07-19 16:40:19 -07:00
2022-04-06 15:21:59 -07:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2022-08-29 14:55:12 -07:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2022-01-27 12:07:53 -08:00
2022-08-05 14:13:12 -07:00
2022-06-03 14:30:34 -07:00
2022-08-29 14:55:11 -07:00
2022-08-22 15:08:30 -07:00
2022-08-05 14:13:12 -07:00
2022-08-12 13:19:08 -07:00
2022-08-03 13:36:09 -07:00
2022-04-06 09:42:12 -07:00
2022-07-18 13:31:54 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-04-20 16:17:33 -07:00
2022-04-20 16:17:33 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00
2022-07-19 12:45:31 -07:00
2022-03-23 14:09:29 -07:00
2022-05-02 09:50:37 -07:00
2022-06-10 15:04:13 -07:00

Build status

Git - fast, scalable, distributed revision control system

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses, compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

Many Git online resources are accessible from https://git-scm.com/ including full documentation and Git related tools.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see Documentation/giteveryday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and Documentation/git-<commandname>.txt for documentation of each command. If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be read with man gittutorial or git help tutorial, and the documentation of each command with man git-<commandname> or git help <commandname>.

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt (man gitcvs-migration or git help cvs-migration if git is installed).

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission and Documentation/CodingGuidelines).

Those wishing to help with error message, usage and informational message string translations (localization l10) should see po/README.md (a po file is a Portable Object file that holds the translations).

To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org (not the Git list). The mailing list archives are available at https://lore.kernel.org/git/, http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

Issues which are security relevant should be disclosed privately to the Git Security mailing list git-security@googlegroups.com.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that list the current status of various development topics to the mailing list. The discussion following them give a good reference for project status, development direction and remaining tasks.

The name "git" was given by Linus Torvalds when he wrote the very first version. He described the tool as "the stupid content tracker" and the name as (depending on your mood):

  • random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not actually used by any common UNIX command. The fact that it is a mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
  • stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the dictionary of slang.
  • "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
  • "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks
Description
No description provided
Readme 279 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.5%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%