Jeff King ca9199300e get_packed_ref_cache: reload packed-refs file when it changes
Once we read the packed-refs file into memory, we cache it
to save work on future ref lookups. However, our cache may
be out of date with respect to what is on disk if another
process is simultaneously packing the refs. Normally it
is acceptable for us to be a little out of date, since there
is no guarantee whether we read the file before or after the
simultaneous update. However, there is an important special
case: our packed-refs file must be up to date with respect
to any loose refs we read. Otherwise, we risk the following
race condition:

  0. There exists a loose ref refs/heads/master.

  1. Process A starts and looks up the ref "master". It
     first checks $GIT_DIR/master, which does not exist. It
     then loads (and caches) the packed-refs file to see if
     "master" exists in it, which it does not.

  2. Meanwhile, process B runs "pack-refs --all --prune". It
     creates a new packed-refs file which contains
     refs/heads/master, and removes the loose copy at
     $GIT_DIR/refs/heads/master.

  3. Process A continues its lookup, and eventually tries
     $GIT_DIR/refs/heads/master.  It sees that the loose ref
     is missing, and falls back to the packed-refs file. But
     it examines its cached version, which does not have
     refs/heads/master. After trying a few other prefixes,
     it reports master as a non-existent ref.

There are many variants (e.g., step 1 may involve process A
looking up another ref entirely, so even a fully qualified
refname can fail). One of the most interesting ones is if
"refs/heads/master" is already packed. In that case process
A will not see it as missing, but rather will report
whatever value happened to be in the packed-refs file before
process B repacked (which might be an arbitrarily old
value).

We can fix this by making sure we reload the packed-refs
file from disk after looking at any loose refs. That's
unacceptably slow, so we can check its stat()-validity as a
proxy, and read it only when it appears to have changed.

Reading the packed-refs file after performing any loose-ref
system calls is sufficient because we know the ordering of
the pack-refs process: it always makes sure the newly
written packed-refs file is installed into place before
pruning any loose refs. As long as those operations by B
appear in their executed order to process A, by the time A
sees the missing loose ref, the new packed-refs file must be
in place.

Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-20 15:50:17 -07:00
2013-06-11 13:30:20 -07:00
2013-05-09 13:32:54 -07:00
2013-04-04 13:03:34 -07:00
2012-10-25 06:42:02 -04:00
2012-10-25 06:42:02 -04:00
2012-10-29 03:08:30 -04:00
2013-06-20 15:50:17 -07:00
2013-04-12 13:54:01 -07:00
2013-06-05 14:53:07 -07:00
2013-02-26 09:16:58 -08:00
2013-04-01 08:59:37 -07:00
2013-05-29 14:23:04 -07:00
2013-02-17 15:25:52 -08:00
2012-11-28 13:52:54 -08:00
2013-03-26 13:15:24 -07:00
2013-06-10 12:34:42 -07:00
2013-06-11 13:30:20 -07:00
2013-05-08 15:31:54 -07:00
2013-04-06 18:56:46 -07:00
2013-04-19 13:31:08 -07:00
2013-04-19 13:31:08 -07:00
2013-04-11 17:39:05 -07:00
2013-04-12 12:25:08 -07:00
2013-06-02 16:00:44 -07:00
2013-01-20 17:06:53 -08:00
2013-06-11 13:30:20 -07:00
2013-04-03 09:18:01 -07:00
2012-10-17 22:42:40 -07:00
2013-06-14 08:46:14 -07:00
2012-10-29 03:08:30 -04:00
2013-05-29 14:23:04 -07:00
2013-04-05 12:39:38 -07:00
2013-06-20 15:50:17 -07:00
2013-02-05 16:13:32 -08:00
2013-06-10 12:34:42 -07:00
2013-05-28 09:03:00 -07:00
2013-06-14 08:46:14 -07:00
2013-06-14 08:46:14 -07:00
2013-06-11 13:31:23 -07:00
2013-06-14 08:46:14 -07:00
2013-06-11 13:30:20 -07:00

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

	Git - the stupid content tracker

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

"git" can mean anything, depending on your mood.

 - random three-letter combination that is pronounceable, and not
   actually used by any common UNIX command.  The fact that it is a
   mispronunciation of "get" may or may not be relevant.
 - stupid. contemptible and despicable. simple. Take your pick from the
   dictionary of slang.
 - "global information tracker": you're in a good mood, and it actually
   works for you. Angels sing, and a light suddenly fills the room.
 - "goddamn idiotic truckload of sh*t": when it breaks

Git is a fast, scalable, distributed revision control system with an
unusually rich command set that provides both high-level operations
and full access to internals.

Git is an Open Source project covered by the GNU General Public
License version 2 (some parts of it are under different licenses,
compatible with the GPLv2). It was originally written by Linus
Torvalds with help of a group of hackers around the net.

Please read the file INSTALL for installation instructions.

See Documentation/gittutorial.txt to get started, then see
Documentation/everyday.txt for a useful minimum set of commands, and
Documentation/git-commandname.txt for documentation of each command.
If git has been correctly installed, then the tutorial can also be
read with "man gittutorial" or "git help tutorial", and the
documentation of each command with "man git-commandname" or "git help
commandname".

CVS users may also want to read Documentation/gitcvs-migration.txt
("man gitcvs-migration" or "git help cvs-migration" if git is
installed).

Many Git online resources are accessible from http://git-scm.com/
including full documentation and Git related tools.

The user discussion and development of Git take place on the Git
mailing list -- everyone is welcome to post bug reports, feature
requests, comments and patches to git@vger.kernel.org (read
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for instructions on patch submission).
To subscribe to the list, send an email with just "subscribe git" in
the body to majordomo@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are
available at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/,
http://marc.info/?l=git and other archival sites.

The maintainer frequently sends the "What's cooking" reports that
list the current status of various development topics to the mailing
list.  The discussion following them give a good reference for
project status, development direction and remaining tasks.
Description
No description provided
Readme 279 MiB
Languages
C 50.5%
Shell 38.7%
Perl 4.5%
Tcl 3.2%
Python 0.8%
Other 2.1%