Same as with "clone", users may want to add a submodule to a repository
with a non-default ref storage format. Wire up a new `--ref-format=`
option that works the same as for `git submodule clone`.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When opening a submodule ref storage we accidentally use the ref storage
format of the owning repository, not of the submodule repository. As
submodules may have a different storage format than their parent repo
this can lead to bugs when trying to access the submodule ref storage
from the parent repository.
One such bug was reported when performing a recursive pull with mixed
ref stores, which fails with:
$ git pull --recursive
fatal: Unable to find current revision in submodule path 'path/to/sub'
The same issue occurs when adding a repository contained in the working
tree with a different ref storage format via `git submodule add`.
Fix the bug by using the submodule repository's ref storage format
instead and add some tests. Note that the test for `git submodule
status` was included as a precaution, only. The command worked alright
even without the bugfix.
Reported-by: Jeppe Øland <joland@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When recursively cloning a repository with a non-default ref storage
format, e.g. by passing the `--ref-format=` option, then only the
top-level repository will end up using that ref storage format, and
all recursively cloned submodules will instead use the default format.
While mixed-format constellations are expected to work alright, the
outcome still is somewhat surprising as we have essentially ignored
the user's request.
Fix this by propagating the requested ref format to cloned submodules.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As submodules are proper self-contained repositories, it is perfectly
valid for them to have a different ref storage format than their parent
repository. There is no obvious way for users to ask for the ref storage
format when initializing submodules though. Whether the setup of such
mixed-ref-storage-format constellations is all that useful remains to be
seen. But there is no good reason to not expose such an option, and we
will require it in a subsequent patch.
Introduce a new `--ref-format=` option for git-submodule(1) that allows
the user to pick the ref storage format. This option will also be used
in a subsequent commit, where we start to propagate the same flag from
git-clone(1) to cloning submodules with the `--recursive` switch.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For most of the subcommands of git-submodule(1), we end up passing a
bunch of arguments to the submodule helper. This quickly leads to overly
long lines, where it becomes hard to spot what has changed when one
needs to modify them.
Break up these lines into one argument per line, similarly to how it is
done for the "clone" subcommand already.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The reviewing guidelines document now explicitly encourages people
to give positive reviews and how.
* jc/doc-reviewing-guidelines-positive-reviews:
ReviewingGuidelines: encourage positive reviews more
"git rebase --help" referred to "offset" (the difference between
the location a change was taken from and the change gets replaced)
incorrectly and called it "fuzz", which has been corrected.
* jc/doc-rebase-fuzz-vs-offset-fix:
doc: difference in location to apply is "offset", not "fuzz"
It has been documented that we avoid "VAR=VAL shell_func" and why.
* jc/doc-one-shot-export-with-shell-func:
CodingGuidelines: document a shell that "fails" "VAR=VAL shell_func"
Another reftable test has been ported to use the unit test framework.
* cp/unit-test-reftable-merged:
t-reftable-merged: add test for REFTABLE_FORMAT_ERROR
t-reftable-merged: use reftable_ref_record_equal to compare ref records
t-reftable-merged: add tests for reftable_merged_table_max_update_index
t-reftable-merged: improve the const-correctness of helper functions
t-reftable-merged: improve the test t_merged_single_record()
t: harmonize t-reftable-merged.c with coding guidelines
t: move reftable/merged_test.c to the unit testing framework
A CI job that use clang-format to check coding style issues in new
code has been added.
* kn/ci-clang-format:
ci/style-check: add `RemoveBracesLLVM` in CI job
check-whitespace: detect if no base_commit is provided
ci: run style check on GitHub and GitLab
clang-format: formalize some of the spacing rules
clang-format: avoid spacing around bitfield colon
clang-format: indent preprocessor directives after hash
"git checkout --ours" (no other arguments) complained that the
option is incompatible with branch switching, which is technically
correct, but found confusing by some users. It now says that the
user needs to give pathspec to specify what paths to checkout.
* jc/checkout-no-op-switch-errors:
checkout: special case error messages during noop switching
"git add -p" by users with diff.suppressBlankEmpty set to true
failed to parse the patch that represents an unmodified empty line
with an empty line (not a line with a single space on it), which
has been corrected.
* pw/add-patch-with-suppress-blank-empty:
add-patch: use normalize_marker() when recounting edited hunk
add-patch: handle splitting hunks with diff.suppressBlankEmpty
A build tweak knob has been simplified by not setting the value
that is already the default; another unused one has been removed.
* rj/make-cleanup:
config.mak.uname: remove unused uname_P variable
Makefile: drop -Wno-universal-initializer from SP_EXTRA_FLAGS
Many Porcelain commands that internally use the merge machinery
were taught to consistently honor the diff.algorithm configuration.
* ad/merge-with-diff-algorithm:
merge-recursive: honor diff.algorithm
Unit test clean-up.
* rs/t-strvec-use-test-msg:
t-strvec: fix type mismatch in check_strvec
t-strvec: improve check_strvec() output
t-strvec: use test_msg()
The documentation to "git rebase" says that the line numbers (in the
rebased change) may not exactly be the same as the line numbers the
change gets replayed on top of the new base, but uses a wrong noun
"fuzz". It should have said "offset".
They are both terms of art. "fuzz" is about context lines not
exactly matching. "offset" is about the difference in the location
that a change was taken from the original and the change gets
replayed on the target. "offset" is often inevitable and part of
normal life. "fuzz" on the other hand is often a sign of trouble
(and indeed "Git" refuses to apply a change with "fuzz", except
there are options to be fuzzy about whitespaces).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I saw some contributors hesitate to give a positive review on
patches by their coworkers. When written well, a positive review
does not have to be a hollow "looks good" that rubber stamps an
useless approval on a topic that is not interesting to others.
Let's add a few paragraphs to encourage positive reviews, which is a
bit harder to give than a review to point out things to improve.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Trivial change to indicate that branches and tags are real options
that can be used combined to get more information. This helps with
linting translations and prompting the user that the terms represent
options.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shopov <ash@kambanaria.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Work around asciidoctor's css that renders `monospace` material
in the SYNOPSIS section of manual pages as block elements.
* js/doc-markup-updates-fix:
Doc: fix Asciidoctor css workaround
asciidoctor: fix `synopsis` rendering
Repacking a repository with multi-pack index started making stupid
pack selections in Git 2.45, which has been corrected.
* ds/midx-write-repack-fix:
midx-write: revert use of --stdin-packs
t5319: add failing test case for repack/expire
The previous step introduced docinfo.html to be used to tweak the
CSS used by the asciidoctor, that by default renders <code> inside
<pre> as a block element, breaking the SYNOPSIS section of a few
pages that adopted a new convention we use since Git 2.45.
But in this project, HTML files are all generated. We do not force
any human to write HTML by hand, which is an unusual and cruel
punishment. "*.html" is in the .gitignore file, and "make clean"
removes them. Having a tracked .html file makes "make clean" make
the tree dirty by removing the tracked docinfo.html file.
Let's do an obvious, minimum and stupid workaround to generate that
file at runtime instead. The mark-up is being rethought in a major
way for the next development cycle, and the CSS workaround we added
in the previous step may have to adjusted, possibly in a large way,
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For 'clang-format', setting 'RemoveBracesLLVM' to 'true', adds a check
to ensure we avoid curly braces for single-statement bodies in
conditional blocks.
However, the option does come with two warnings [1]:
This option will be renamed and expanded to support other styles.
and
Setting this option to true could lead to incorrect code formatting
due to clang-format’s lack of complete semantic information. As
such, extra care should be taken to review code changes made by
this option.
The latter seems to be of concern. While we want to experiment with the
rule, adding it to the in-tree '.clang-format' could affect end-users.
Let's only add it to the CI jobs for now. With time, we can evaluate
its efficacy and decide if we want to add it to '.clang-format' or
retract it entirely. We do so, by adding the existing rules in
'.clang-format' and this rule to a temp file outside the working tree,
which is then used by 'git clang-format'. This ensures we don't murk
with files in-tree.
[1]: https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html#removebracesllvm
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'check-whitespace' CI script exits gracefully if no base commit is
provided or if an invalid revision is provided. This is not good because
if a particular CI provides an incorrect base_commit, it would fail
successfully.
This is exactly the case with the GitLab CI. The CI is using the
"$CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" variable to get the base commit
SHA, but variable is only defined for _merged_ pipelines. So it is empty
for regular pipelines [1]. This should've failed the check-whitespace
job.
Let's fallback to 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' if
"CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA" isn't available in GitLab CI,
similar to the previous commit. Let's also add a check for incorrect
base_commit in the 'check-whitespace.sh' script. While here, fix a small
typo too.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We don't run style checks on our CI, even though we have a
'.clang-format' setup in the repository. Let's add one, the job will
validate only against the new commits added and will only run on merge
requests. Since we're introducing it for the first time, let's allow
this job to fail, so we can validate if this is useful and eventually
enforce it.
For GitHub, we allow the job to pass by adding 'continue-on-error: true'
to the workflow. This means the job would show as passed, even if the
style check failed. To know the status of the job, users have to
manually check the logs.
For GitLab, we allow the job to pass by adding 'allow_failure: true', to
the job. Unlike GitHub, here the job will show as failed with a yellow
warning symbol, but the pipeline would still show as passed.
Also for GitLab, we use the 'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_TARGET_BRANCH_SHA'
variable by default to obtain the base SHA of the merged pipeline (which
is only available for merged pipelines [1]). Otherwise we use the
'CI_MERGE_REQUEST_DIFF_BASE_SHA' variable.
[1]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/ci/variables/predefined_variables.html#predefined-variables-for-merge-request-pipelines
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are some spacing rules that we follow in the project and it makes
sense to formalize them:
* Ensure there is no space inserted after the logical not '!' operator.
* Ensure there is no space before the case statement's colon.
* Ensure there is no space before the first bracket '[' of an array.
* Ensure there is no space in empty blocks.
Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
