Without the word "the", the sentence is a little harder to read. The
word "the" makes it clearer that the comment refers to discrete patches,
and not portions of individual patches.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Watson <ozzloy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint-2.35:
Git 2.35.7
Git 2.34.7
http: support CURLOPT_PROTOCOLS_STR
http: prefer CURLOPT_SEEKFUNCTION to CURLOPT_IOCTLFUNCTION
http-push: prefer CURLOPT_UPLOAD to CURLOPT_PUT
Git 2.33.7
Git 2.32.6
Git 2.31.7
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
* maint-2.34:
Git 2.34.7
http: support CURLOPT_PROTOCOLS_STR
http: prefer CURLOPT_SEEKFUNCTION to CURLOPT_IOCTLFUNCTION
http-push: prefer CURLOPT_UPLOAD to CURLOPT_PUT
Git 2.33.7
Git 2.32.6
Git 2.31.7
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
* maint-2.33:
Git 2.33.7
Git 2.32.6
Git 2.31.7
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
* maint-2.32:
Git 2.32.6
Git 2.31.7
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
* maint-2.31:
Git 2.31.7
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
* maint-2.30:
Git 2.30.8
apply: fix writing behind newly created symbolic links
dir-iterator: prevent top-level symlinks without FOLLOW_SYMLINKS
clone: delay picking a transport until after get_repo_path()
t5619: demonstrate clone_local() with ambiguous transport
Clarify that "the sentence after <area>: prefix does not begin with
a capital letter" rule applies only to the commit title.
* jc/use-of-uc-in-log-messages:
SubmittingPatches: use usual capitalization in the log message body
"git multi-pack-index repack/expire" used to repack unreachable
cruft into a new pack, which have been corrected.
cf. <63a1c3d4-eff3-af10-4263-058c88e74594@github.com>
* tb/midx-repack-ignore-cruft-packs:
midx.c: avoid cruft packs with non-zero `repack --batch-size`
midx.c: remove unnecessary loop condition
midx.c: replace `xcalloc()` with `CALLOC_ARRAY()`
midx.c: avoid cruft packs with `repack --batch-size=0`
midx.c: prevent `expire` from removing the cruft pack
Documentation/git-multi-pack-index.txt: clarify expire behavior
Documentation/git-multi-pack-index.txt: fix typo
Documentation on various Boolean GIT_* environment variables have
been clarified.
* jc/environ-docs:
environ: GIT_INDEX_VERSION affects not just a new repository
environ: simplify description of GIT_INDEX_FILE
environ: GIT_FLUSH should be made a usual Boolean
environ: explain Boolean environment variables
environ: document GIT_SSL_NO_VERIFY
Update CodingGuidelines to clarify what features to use and avoid
in C99.
* ab/coding-guidelines-c99:
CodingGuidelines: recommend against unportable C99 struct syntax
CodingGuidelines: mention C99 features we can't use
CodingGuidelines: allow declaring variables in for loops
CodingGuidelines: mention dynamic C99 initializer elements
CodingGuidelines: update for C99
Per 33665d98e6 (reftable: make assignments portable to AIX xlc
v12.01, 2022-03-28) forms like ".a.b = *c" can be replaced by using
".a = { .b = *c }" instead.
We'll probably allow these sooner than later, but since the workaround
is trivial let's note it among the C99 features we'd like to hold off
on for now.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The C99 section of the CodingGuidelines is a good overview of what we
can use, but is sorely lacking in what we can't use. Something that
comes up occasionally is the portability of %z.
Per [1] we couldn't use it for the longest time due to MSVC not
supporting it, but nowadays by requiring C99 we rely on the MSVC
version that does, but we can't use it yet because a C library that
MinGW uses doesn't support it.
1. https://lore.kernel.org/git/a67e0fd8-4a14-16c9-9b57-3430440ef93c@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 44ba10d671 (revision: use C99 declaration of variable in for()
loop, 2021-11-14) released with v2.35.0 we've had a variable declared
with in a for loop.
Since then we've had inadvertent follow-ups to that with at least
cb2607759e (merge-ort: store more specific conflict information,
2022-06-18) released with v2.38.0.
As November 2022 is within the window of this upcoming release,
let's update the guideline to allow this. We can have the promised
"revisit" discussion while this patch cooks, and drop it if it turns
out that it is still premature, which is not expected to happen at
this moment.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The first use of variables in initializer elements appears to have
been 2b6854c863 (Cleanup variables in cat-file, 2007-04-21) released
with v1.5.2.
Some of those caused portability issues, and e.g. that "cat-file" use
was changed in 66dbfd55e3 (Rewrite dynamic structure initializations
to runtime assignment, 2010-05-14) which went out with v1.7.2.
But curiously 66dbfd55e3 missed some of them, e.g. an archive.c use
added in d5f53d6d6f (archive: complain about path specs that don't
match anything, 2009-12-12), and another one in merge-index.c (later
builtin/merge-index.c) in 0077138cd9 (Simplify some instances of
run_command() by using run_command_v_opt()., 2009-06-08).
As far as I can tell there's been no point since 2b6854c863 in 2007
where a compiler that didn't support this has been able to compile
git. Presumably 66dbfd55e3 was an attempt to make headway with wider
portability that ultimately wasn't completed.
In any case, we are thoroughly reliant on this syntax at this point,
so let's update the guidelines, see
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqy1tunjgp.fsf@gitster.g/ for the
initial discussion.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 7bc341e21b (git-compat-util: add a test balloon for C99
support, 2021-12-01) we've had a hard dependency on C99, but the prose
in CodingGuidelines was written under the assumption that we were
using C89 with a few C99 features.
As the updated prose notes we'd still like to hold off on novel C99
features, but let's make it clear that we target that C version, and
then enumerate new C99 features that are safe to use.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
