Ensure what we write in assert() does not have side effects,
and introduce ASSERT() macro to mark those that cannot be
mechanically checked for lack of side effects.
* en/assert-wo-side-effects:
treewide: replace assert() with ASSERT() in special cases
ci: add build checking for side-effects in assert() calls
git-compat-util: introduce ASSERT() macro
Miscellaneous code clean-ups.
* en/random-cleanups:
merge-ort: remove extraneous word in comment
merge-ort: fix accidental strset<->strintmap
t7615: be more explicit about diff algorithm used
t6423: fix a comment that accidentally reversed two commits
stash: remove merge-recursive.h include
First step of deprecating and removing merge-recursive.
* en/merge-ort-prepare-to-remove-recursive:
am: switch from merge_recursive_generic() to merge_ort_generic()
merge-ort: fix merge.directoryRenames=false
t3650: document bug when directory renames are turned off
merge-ort: support having merge verbosity be set to 0
merge-ort: allow rename detection to be disabled
merge-ort: add new merge_ort_generic() function
When the compiler/linker cannot verify that an assert() invocation is
free of side effects for us (e.g. because the assertion includes some
kind of function call), replace the use of assert() with ASSERT().
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are two issues here.
First, when merge.directoryRenames is set to false, there are a few code
paths that should be turned off. I missed one; collect_renames() was
still doing some directory rename detection logic unconditionally. It
ended up not having much effect because
get_provisional_directory_renames() was skipped earlier and not setting
up renames->dir_renames, but the code should still be skipped.
Second, the larger issue is that sometimes we get a cached_pair rename
from a previous commit being replayed mapping A->B, but in a subsequent
commit but collect_merge_info() doesn't even recurse into the
directory containing B because there are no source pairings for that
rename that are relevant; we can merge that commit fine without knowing
the rename. But since the cached renames are added to the normal
renames, when we go to process it and find that B is not part of
opt->priv->paths, we hit the assertion error
process_renames: Assertion `newinfo && ~newinfo->merged.clean` failed.
I think we could fix this at the beginning of detect_regular_renames() by
pruning from cached_pairs any entry whose destination isn't in
opt->priv->paths, but it's suboptimal in that we'd kind of like the
cached_pair to be restored afterwards so that it can help the subsequent
commit, but more importantly since it sits at the intersection of
the caching renames optimization and the relevant renames optimization,
and the trivial directory resolution optimization, and I don't currently
have Documentation/technical/remembering-renames.txt fully paged in, I'm
not sure if that's a full solution or a bandaid for the current
testcase. However, since the remembering renames optimization was the
weakest of the set, and the optimization is far less important when
directory rename detection is off (as that implies far fewer potential
renames), let's just use a bigger hammer to ensure this special case is
fixed: turn off the rename caching. We do the same thing already when
we encounter rename/rename(1to1) cases (as per `git grep -3
disabling.the.optimization`, though it uses a slightly different
triggering mechanism since it's trying to affect the next time that
merge_check_renames_reusable() is called), and I think it makes sense
to do the same here.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When merge-ort was written, I did not at first allow rename detection to
be disabled, because I suspected that most folks disabling rename
detection were doing so solely for performance reasons. Since I put a
lot of working into providing dramatic speedups for rename detection
performance as used by the merge machinery, I wanted to know if there
were still real world repositories where rename detection was
problematic from a performance perspective. We have had years now to
collect such information, and while we never received one, waiting
longer with the option disabled seems unlikely to help surface such
issues at this point. Also, there has been at least one request to
allow rename detection to be disabled for behavioral rather than
performance reasons (see the thread including
https://lore.kernel.org/git/CABPp-BG-Nx6SCxxkGXn_Fwd2wseifMFND8eddvWxiZVZk0zRaA@mail.gmail.com/
), so let's start heeding the config and command line settings.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-recursive.[ch] have three entry points:
* merge_trees()
* merge_recursive()
* merge_recursive_generic()
merge-ort*.[ch] only has equivalents for the first two. Add an
equivalent for the final entry point, so we can switch callers to
use it and remove merge-recursive.[ch].
While porting it over, finally fix the issue with the label for the
ancestor (used when merge.conflictStyle=diff3 as a conflict label).
merge-recursive.c has traditionally not allowed callers to set that
label, but I have found that problematic for years.
(Side note: This function was initially part of the merge-ort rewrite,
but reviewers questioned the ancestor label funnyness which I was
never really happy with anyway. It resulted in me jettisoning it and
hoping at the time that I would eventually be able to force the existing
callers to use some other API. That worked with `git stash`, as per
874cf2a604 (stash: apply stash using 'merge_ort_nonrecursive()',
2022-05-10), but this API is the most reasonable one for `git am` and
`git merge-recursive`, if we can just allow them some freedom over the
ancestor label.)
The merge_recursive_generic() function did not know whether it was being
invoked by `git stash`, `git merge-recursive`, or `git am`, and the
choice of meaningful ancestor label, when there is a unique ancestor,
varies for these different callers:
* git am: ancestor is a constructed "fake ancestor" that user knows
nothing about and has no access to. (And is different than
the normal thing we mean by a "virtual merge base" which is
the merging of merge bases.)
* git merge-recursive: ancestor might be a tree, but at least it
was one specified by the user (if they invoked
merge-recursive directly)
* git stash: ancestor was the commit serving as the stash base
Thus, using a label like "constructed merge base" (as
merge_recursive_generic() does) presupposes that `git am` is the only
caller; it is incorrect for other callers. This label has thrown me off
more than once. Allow the caller to override when there is a unique
merge base.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Both strset_for_each_entry and strintmap_for_each_entry are macros that
evaluate to the same thing, so they are technically interchangeable.
However, the intent is that we use the one matching the variable type we
are passing. Unfortunately, I somehow mistakenly got one of these wrong
in 7bee6c1004 (merge-ort: avoid recursing into directories when we
don't need to, 2021-07-16) -- possibly related to the fact that
relevant_sources was initially a strset and later refactored into a
strintmap. Correct which macro we use.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge-ort has a number of sanity checks on the file it is processing in
process_renames(). One of these sanity checks was slightly overzealous
because it indirectly assumed that a renamed file always ended up at a
different path than where it started. That is normally an entirely fair
assumption, but directory rename detection can make things interesting.
As a quick refresher, if one side of history renames directory A/ -> B/,
and the other side of history adds new files to A/, then directory
rename detection notices and suggests moving those new files to B/. A
similar thing is done for paths renamed into A/, causing them to be
transitively renamed into B/. But, if the file originally came from B/,
then this can end up causing a file to be renamed back to itself.
It turns out the rest of the code following this assertion handled the
case fine; the assertion was just an extra sanity check, not a rigid
precondition. Therefore, simply adjust the assertion to pass under this
special case as well.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark code units that generate warnings with `-Wsign-compare`. This
allows for a structured approach to get rid of all such warnings over
time in a way that can be easily measured.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The lifecycle management of diff queues is somewhat confusing:
- For most of the part this can be attributed to `DIFF_QUEUE_CLEAR()`,
which does not release any memory but rather initializes the queue,
only. This is in contrast to our common naming schema, where
"clearing" means that we release underlying memory and then
re-initialize the data structure such that it is ready to use.
- A second offender is `diff_free_queue()`, which does not free the
queue structure itself. It is rather a release-style function.
Refactor the code to make things less confusing. `DIFF_QUEUE_CLEAR()` is
replaced by `DIFF_QUEUE_INIT` and `diff_queue_init()`, while
`diff_free_queue()` is replaced by `diff_queue_release()`. While on it,
adapt callsites where we call `DIFF_QUEUE_CLEAR()` with the intent to
release underlying memory to instead call `diff_queue_clear()` to fix
memory leaks.
This memory leak is exposed by t4211, but plugging it alone does not
make the whole test suite pass.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Typofix.
* ak/typofix-2.46-maint:
upload-pack: fix a typo
sideband: fix a typo
setup: fix a typo
run-command: fix a typo
revision: fix a typo
refs: fix typos
rebase: fix a typo
read-cache-ll: fix a typo
pretty: fix a typo
object-file: fix a typo
merge-ort: fix typos
merge-ll: fix a typo
http: fix a typo
gpg-interface: fix a typo
git-p4: fix typos
git-instaweb: fix a typo
fsmonitor-settings: fix a typo
diffcore-rename: fix typos
config.mak.dev: fix a typo
There are two leaks in `apply_directory_rename_modifications()`:
- We do not release the `dirs_to_insert` string list.
- We do not release some `conflict_info` we put into the
`opt->priv->paths` string map.
The former is trivial to fix. The latter is a bit less straight forward:
the `util` pointer of the string map may sometimes point to data that
has been allocated via `CALLOC()`, while at other times it may point to
data that has been allocated via a `mem_pool`.
It very much seems like an oversight that we didn't also allocate the
conflict info in this code path via the memory pool, though. So let's
fix that, which will also plug the memory leak for us.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We conditionally release the index used for reading gitattributes in
merge-ort based on whether or the index has been populated. This check
uses `cache_nr` as a condition. This isn't sufficient though, as the
variable may be zero even when some other parts of the index have been
populated. This leads to memory leaks when sparse checkouts are in use,
as we may not end up releasing the sparse checkout patterns.
Fix this issue by unconditionally releasing the index.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "ort" merge backend saw one bugfix for a crash that happens
when inner merge gets killed, and assorted code clean-ups.
* en/ort-inner-merge-error-fix:
merge-ort: fix missing early return
merge-ort: convert more error() cases to path_msg()
merge-ort: upon merge abort, only show messages causing the abort
merge-ort: loosen commented requirements
merge-ort: clearer propagation of failure-to-function from merge_submodule
merge-ort: fix type of local 'clean' var in handle_content_merge ()
merge-ort: maintain expected invariant for priv member
merge-ort: extract handling of priv member into reusable function
One of the conversions in f19b9165 (merge-ort: convert more error()
cases to path_msg(), 2024-06-19) accidentally lost the early return.
Restore it.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
merge_submodule() stores errors using path_msg(), whereas other call
sites make use of the error() function. This is inconsistent, and
moving towards path_msg() seems more friendly for libification efforts
since it will allow the caller to determine whether the error messages
need to be printed.
Note that this deferred handling of error messages changes the error
message in a recursive merge from
error: failed to execute internal merge
to
From inner merge: error: failed to execute internal merge
which provides a little more information about the error which may be
useful. Since the recursive merge strategy still only shows the older
error, we had to adjust the new testcase introduced a few commits ago to
just search for the older message somewhere in the output.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When something goes wrong enough that we need to abort early and not
even attempt merging the remaining files, it probably does not make
sense to report conflicts messages for the subset of files we processed
before hitting the fatal error. Instead, only show the messages
associated with paths where we hit the fatal error. Also, print these
messages to stderr rather than stdout.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The comment above type_short_descriptions claimed that the order had to
match what was found in the conflict_info_and_types enum. Since
type_short_descriptions uses designated initializers, the order should
not actually matter; I am guessing that positional initializers may have
been under consideration when that comment was added, but the comment
was not updated when designated initializers were chosen.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'clean' member variable is somewhat of a tri-state (1 = clean, 0 =
conflicted, -1 = failure-to-determine), but we often like to think of
it as binary (ignoring the possibility of a negative value) and use
constructs like '!clean' to reflect this. However, these constructs
can make codepaths more difficult to understand, unless we handle the
negative case early and return pre-emptively; do that in
handle_content_merge() to make the code a bit easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
handle_content_merge() returns an int. Every caller of
handle_content_merge() expects an int. However, we declare a local
variable 'clean' that we use for the return value to be unsigned. To
make matters worse, we also assign 'clean' the return value of
merge_submodule() in one codepath, which is defined to return an int.
It seems that the only reason to have 'clean' be unsigned was to allow a
cutesy bit manipulation operation to be well-defined. Fix the type of
the 'clean' local in handle_content_merge().
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The calling convention for the merge machinery is
One call to init_merge_options()
One or more calls to merge_incore_[non]recursive()
One call to merge_finalize()
(possibly indirectly via merge_switch_to_result())
Both merge_switch_to_result() and merge_finalize() expect
opt->priv == NULL && result->priv != NULL
which is supposed to be set up by our move_opt_priv_to_result_priv()
function. However, two codepaths dealing with error cases did not
execute this necessary logic, which could result in assertion failures
(or, if assertions were compiled out, could result in segfaults). Fix
the oversight and add a test that would have caught one of these
problems.
While at it, also tighten an existing test for a non-recursive merge
to verify that it fails with appropriate status. Most merge tests in
the testsuite check either for success or conflicts; those testing for
neither are rare and it is good to ensure they support the invariant
assumed by builtin/merge.c in this comment:
/*
* The backend exits with 1 when conflicts are
* left to be resolved, with 2 when it does not
* handle the given merge at all.
*/
So, explicitly check for the exit status of 2 in these cases.
Reported-by: Matt Cree <matt.cree@gearset.com>
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In preparation for a subsequent commit which will ensure we do not
forget to maintain our invariants for the priv member in error
codepaths, extract the necessary functionality out into a separate
function. This change is cosmetic at this point, and introduces no
changes beyond an extra assertion sanity check.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use of the `the_repository` variable is deprecated nowadays, and we
slowly but steadily convert the codebase to not use it anymore. Instead,
callers should be passing down the repository to work on via parameters.
It is hard though to prove that a given code unit does not use this
variable anymore. The most trivial case, merely demonstrating that there
is no direct use of `the_repository`, is already a bit of a pain during
code reviews as the reviewer needs to manually verify claims made by the
patch author. The bigger problem though is that we have many interfaces
that implicitly rely on `the_repository`.
Introduce a new `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE` macro that allows code
units to opt into usage of `the_repository`. The intent of this macro is
to demonstrate that a certain code unit does not use this variable
anymore, and to keep it from new dependencies on it in future changes,
be it explicit or implicit
For now, the macro only guards `the_repository` itself as well as
`the_hash_algo`. There are many more known interfaces where we have an
implicit dependency on `the_repository`, but those are not guarded at
the current point in time. Over time though, we should start to add
guards as required (or even better, just remove them).
Define the macro as required in our code units. As expected, most of our
code still relies on the global variable. Nearly all of our builtins
rely on the variable as there is no way yet to pass `the_repository` to
their entry point. For now, declare the macro in "biultin.h" to keep the
required changes at least a little bit more contained.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When calling either the recursive or the ORT merge machineries we need
to provide a list of merge bases. The ownership of that parameter is
then implicitly transferred to the callee, which is somewhat fishy.
Furthermore, that list may leak in some cases where the merge machinery
runs into an error, thus causing a memory leak.
Refactor the code such that we stop transferring ownership. Instead, the
merge machinery will now create its own local copies of the passed in
list as required if they need to modify the list. Free the list at the
callsites as required.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout --conflict=bad" reported a bad conflictStyle as if it
were given to a configuration variable; it has been corrected to
report that the command line option is bad.
* pw/checkout-conflict-errorfix:
checkout: fix interaction between --conflict and --merge
checkout: cleanup --conflict=<style> parsing
merge options: add a conflict style member
merge-ll: introduce LL_MERGE_OPTIONS_INIT
xdiff-interface: refactor parsing of merge.conflictstyle
Work to support a repository that work with both SHA-1 and SHA-256
hash algorithms has started.
* eb/hash-transition: (30 commits)
t1016-compatObjectFormat: add tests to verify the conversion between objects
t1006: test oid compatibility with cat-file
t1006: rename sha1 to oid
test-lib: compute the compatibility hash so tests may use it
builtin/ls-tree: let the oid determine the output algorithm
object-file: handle compat objects in check_object_signature
tree-walk: init_tree_desc take an oid to get the hash algorithm
builtin/cat-file: let the oid determine the output algorithm
rev-parse: add an --output-object-format parameter
repository: implement extensions.compatObjectFormat
object-file: update object_info_extended to reencode objects
object-file-convert: convert commits that embed signed tags
object-file-convert: convert commit objects when writing
object-file-convert: don't leak when converting tag objects
object-file-convert: convert tag objects when writing
object-file-convert: add a function to convert trees between algorithms
object: factor out parse_mode out of fast-import and tree-walk into in object.h
cache: add a function to read an OID of a specific algorithm
tag: sign both hashes
commit: export add_header_signature to support handling signatures on tags
...
Add a conflict_style member to `struct merge_options` and `struct
ll_merge_options` to allow callers to override the default conflict
style. This will be used in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Introduce a macro to initialize `struct ll_merge_options` in preparation
for the next commit that will add a new member that needs to be
initialized to a non-zero value.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 24876ebf68 (commit-reach(repo_in_merge_bases_many): report missing
commits, 2024-02-28), I taught `merge_submodule()` to handle errors
reported by `repo_in_merge_bases_many()`.
However, those errors were not passed through to the callers. That was
unintentional, and this commit remedies that.
Note that `find_first_merges()` can now also return -1 (because it
passes through that return value from `repo_in_merge_bases()`), and this
commit also adds the forgotten handling for that scenario.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git merge-tree" has learned that the three trees involved in the
3-way merge only need to be trees, not necessarily commits.
* js/merge-tree-3-trees:
fill_tree_descriptor(): mark error message for translation
cache-tree: avoid an unnecessary check
Always check `parse_tree*()`'s return value
t4301: verify that merge-tree fails on missing blob objects
merge-ort: do check `parse_tree()`'s return value
merge-tree: fail with a non-zero exit code on missing tree objects
merge-tree: accept 3 trees as arguments
The `merge_bases_many()` function was just taught to indicate parsing
errors, and now the `repo_get_merge_bases()` function (which is also
surfaced via the `repo_get_merge_bases()` macro) is aware of that, too.
Naturally, there are a lot of callers that need to be adjusted now, too.
Next step: adjust the callers of `get_octopus_merge_bases()`.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some functions in Git's source code follow the convention that returning
a negative value indicates a fatal error, e.g. repository corruption.
Let's use this convention in `repo_in_merge_bases()` to report when one
of the specified commits is missing (i.e. when `repo_parse_commit()`
reports an error).
Also adjust the callers of `repo_in_merge_bases()` to handle such
negative return values.
Note: As of this patch, errors are returned only if any of the specified
merge heads is missing. Over the course of the next patches, missing
commits will also be reported by the `paint_down_to_common()` function,
which is called by `repo_in_merge_bases_many()`, and those errors will
be properly propagated back to the caller at that stage.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new advice type 'submoduleMergeConflict' for the error message
shown when a non-trivial submodule conflict is encountered, which
was added in 4057523a40 (submodule merge: update conflict error
message, 2022-08-04). That commit mentions making this message an
advice as possible future work. The message can now be disabled
with the advice mechanism.
Update the tests as the expected message now appears on stderr instead
of stdout.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Otherwise we may easily run into serious crashes: For example, if we run
`init_tree_desc()` directly after a failed `parse_tree()`, we are
accessing uninitialized data or trying to dereference `NULL`.
Note that the `parse_tree()` function already takes care of showing an
error message. The `parse_tree_indirectly()` and
`repo_get_commit_tree()` functions do not, therefore those latter call
sites need to show a useful error message while the former do not.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit fixed a bug where a missing tree was reported, but
not treated as an error.
This patch addresses the same issue for the remaining two callers of
`parse_tree()`.
This change is not accompanied by a regression test because the code in
question is only reached at the `checkout` stage, i.e. after the merge
has happened (and therefore the tree objects could only be missing if
the disk had gone bad in that short time window, or something similarly
tricky to recreate in the test suite).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When `git merge-tree` encounters a missing tree object, it should error
out and not continue quietly as if nothing had happened.
However, as of time of writing, `git merge-tree` _does_ continue, and
then offers the empty tree as result.
Let's fix this.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 70c70de616 (refs: complete list of special refs, 2023-12-14) we have
inrtoduced a new `is_special_ref()` function that classifies some refs
as being special. The rule is that special refs are exclusively read and
written via the filesystem directly, whereas normal refs exclucsively go
via the refs API.
The intent of that commit was to record the status quo so that we know
to route reads of such special refs consistently. Eventually, the list
should be reduced to its bare minimum of refs which really are special,
namely FETCH_HEAD and MERGE_HEAD.
Follow up on this promise and convert the AUTO_MERGE ref to become a
normal pseudo-ref by using the refs API to both read and write it
instead of accessing the filesystem directly.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Each of these were checked with
gcc -E -I. ${SOURCE_FILE} | grep ${HEADER_FILE}
to ensure that removing the direct inclusion of the header actually
resulted in that header no longer being included at all (i.e. that
no other header pulled it in transitively).
...except for a few cases where we verified that although the header
was brought in transitively, nothing from it was directly used in
that source file. These cases were:
* builtin/credential-cache.c
* builtin/pull.c
* builtin/send-pack.c
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix "git merge-tree" to stop segfaulting when the --attr-source
option is used.
* jc/merge-ort-attr-index-fix:
merge-ort: initialize repo in index state
initialize_attr_index() does not initialize the repo member of
attr_index. Starting in 44451a2e5e (attr: teach "--attr-source=<tree>"
global option to "git", 2023-05-06), this became a problem because
istate->repo gets passed down the call chain starting in
git_check_attr(). This gets passed all the way down to
replace_refs_enabled(), which segfaults when accessing r->gitdir.
Fix this by initializing the repository in the index state.
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
