"git pack-objects" learned to invoke a new hook program that
enumerates extra objects to be used as anchoring points to keep
otherwise unreachable objects in cruft packs.
* tb/gc-recent-object-hook:
gc: introduce `gc.recentObjectsHook`
reachable.c: extract `obj_is_recent()`
Suggest to refrain from using hex literals that are non-portable
when writing printf(1) format strings.
* jt/doc-use-octal-with-printf:
CodingGuidelines: use octal escapes, not hex
"git cat-file --batch" and friends learned "-Z" that uses NUL
delimiter for both input and output.
* ps/cat-file-null-output:
cat-file: add option '-Z' that delimits input and output with NUL
cat-file: simplify reading from standard input
strbuf: provide CRLF-aware helper to read until a specified delimiter
t1006: modernize test style to use `test_cmp`
t1006: don't strip timestamps from expected results
The object traversal using reachability bitmap done by
"pack-object" has been tweaked to take advantage of the fact that
using "boundary" commits as representative of all the uninteresting
ones can save quite a lot of object enumeration.
* tb/pack-bitmap-traversal-with-boundary:
pack-bitmap.c: use commit boundary during bitmap traversal
pack-bitmap.c: extract `fill_in_bitmap()`
object: add object_array initializer helper function
'git worktree add' learned how to create a worktree based on an
orphaned branch with `--orphan`.
* ja/worktree-orphan:
worktree add: emit warn when there is a bad HEAD
worktree add: extend DWIM to infer --orphan
worktree add: introduce "try --orphan" hint
worktree add: add --orphan flag
t2400: add tests to verify --quiet
t2400: refactor "worktree add" opt exclusion tests
t2400: cleanup created worktree in test
worktree add: include -B in usage docs
Document more pseudo-refs and teach the command line completion
machinery to complete AUTO_MERGE.
* pb/complete-and-document-auto-merge-and-friends:
completion: complete AUTO_MERGE
Documentation: document AUTO_MERGE
git-merge.txt: modernize word choice in "True merge" section
completion: complete REVERT_HEAD and BISECT_HEAD
revisions.txt: document more special refs
revisions.txt: use description list for special refs
`credential reject` sends the erase action to each helper, but the
exact behaviour of erase isn't specified in documentation or tests.
Some helpers (such as credential-store and credential-libsecret) delete
all matching credentials, others (such as credential-cache) delete at
most one matching credential.
Test that helpers erase all matching credentials. This behaviour is
easiest to reason about. Users expect that `echo
"url=https://example.com" | git credential reject` or `echo
"url=https://example.com\nusername=tim" | git credential reject` erase
all matching credentials.
Fix credential-cache.
Signed-off-by: M Hickford <mirth.hickford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
ls-tree --format expands %x followed by two hexadecimal digits to the
character indicated by that hexadecimal number, e.g.:
$ git ls-tree --format=%x41 HEAD | head -1
A
It rejects % followed by a hexadecimal digit, e.g.:
$ git ls-tree --format=%41 HEAD | head -1
fatal: bad ls-tree format: element '41' does not start with '('
This functionality is provided by strbuf_expand_literal_cb(), which has
not been changed since it was factored out by fd2015b323 (strbuf:
separate callback for strbuf_expand:ing literals, 2019-01-28).
Adjust the documentation accordingly.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Be more up-front about what trailers are in practice with examples, to
give the reader a visual cue while they go on to read the rest of the
description.
Also add an example for multiline values.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'key' option is used frequently in the examples at the bottom but
there is no mention of it in the description.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This puts the deprecation notice up front, instead of leaving it to the
next paragraph.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We already use angle brackets elsewhere, so this makes things more
consistent.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The phrase "many rules" gets essentially repeated again with "many other
rules", so remove this repetition.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, "message" could mean the input, output, commit message, or
"internal body text inside the commit message" (in the EXAMPLES
section). Avoid overloading this term by using the appropriate meanings
explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The command can take inputs that are either just a commit message, or
an email-like output such as git-format-patch which includes a commit
message, "---" divider, and patch part. The existing explanation blends
these two inputs together in the first sentence
This command reads some patches or commit messages
which then necessitates using the "commit message part" phrasing (as
opposed to just "commit message") because the input is ambiguous per the
above definition.
This change separates the two input types and explains them separately,
and so there is no longer a need to use the "commit message part"
phrase.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This matches the order already used in the NAME section.
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend the shell-scripting section of CodingGuidelines to suggest octal
escape sequences (e.g. "\302\242") over hexadecimal (e.g. "\xc2\xa2")
since the latter can be a source of portability problems.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some atoms that can be used in "--format=<format>" for "git ls-tree"
were not supported by "git ls-files", even though they were relevant
in the context of the latter.
* zh/ls-files-format-atoms:
ls-files: align format atoms with ls-tree
"git pack-refs" learns "--include" and "--exclude" to tweak the ref
hierarchy to be packed using pattern matching.
* jc/pack-ref-exclude-include:
pack-refs: teach pack-refs --include option
pack-refs: teach --exclude option to exclude refs from being packed
docs: clarify git-pack-refs --all will pack all refs
Doc update.
* sa/doc-ls-remote:
ls-remote doc: document the output format
ls-remote doc: explain what each example does
ls-remote doc: show peeled tags in examples
ls-remote doc: remove redundant --tags example
show-branch doc: say <ref>, not <reference>
show-ref doc: update for internal consistency
The "-s" (silent, squelch) option of the "diff" family of commands
did not interact with other options that specify the output format
well. This has been cleaned up so that it will clear all the
formatting options given before.
* jc/diff-s-with-other-options:
diff: fix interaction between the "-s" option and other options
"git tag" learned to leave the "$GIT_DIR/TAG_EDITMSG" file when the
command failed, so that the user can salvage what they typed.
* kh/keep-tag-editmsg-upon-failure:
tag: keep the message file in case ref transaction fails
t/t7004-tag: add regression test for successful tag creation
doc: tag: document `TAG_EDITMSG`
This patch introduces a new multi-valued configuration option,
`gc.recentObjectsHook` as a means to mark certain objects as recent (and
thus exempt from garbage collection), regardless of their age.
When performing a garbage collection operation on a repository with
unreachable objects, Git makes its decision on what to do with those
object(s) based on how recent the objects are or not. Generally speaking,
unreachable-but-recent objects stay in the repository, and older objects
are discarded.
However, we have no convenient way to keep certain precious, unreachable
objects around in the repository, even if they have aged out and would
be pruned. Our options today consist of:
- Point references at the reachability tips of any objects you
consider precious, which may be undesirable or infeasible if there
are many such objects.
- Track them via the reflog, which may be undesirable since the
reflog's lifetime is limited to that of the reference it's tracking
(and callers may want to keep those unreachable objects around for
longer).
- Extend the grace period, which may keep around other objects that
the caller *does* want to discard.
- Manually modify the mtimes of objects you want to keep. If those
objects are already loose, this is easy enough to do (you can just
enumerate and `touch -m` each one).
But if they are packed, you will either end up modifying the mtimes
of *all* objects in that pack, or be forced to write out a loose
copy of that object, both of which may be undesirable. Even worse,
if they are in a cruft pack, that requires modifying its `*.mtimes`
file by hand, since there is no exposed plumbing for this.
- Force the caller to construct the pack of objects they want
to keep themselves, and then mark the pack as kept by adding a
".keep" file. This works, but is burdensome for the caller, and
having extra packs is awkward as you roll forward your cruft pack.
This patch introduces a new option to the above list via the
`gc.recentObjectsHook` configuration, which allows the caller to
specify a program (or set of programs) whose output is treated as a set
of objects to treat as recent, regardless of their true age.
The implementation is straightforward. Git enumerates recent objects via
`add_unseen_recent_objects_to_traversal()`, which enumerates loose and
packed objects, and eventually calls add_recent_object() on any objects
for which `want_recent_object()`'s conditions are met.
This patch modifies the recency condition from simply "is the mtime of
this object more recent than the cutoff?" to "[...] or, is this object
mentioned by at least one `gc.recentObjectsHook`?".
Depending on whether or not we are generating a cruft pack, this allows
the caller to do one of two things:
- If generating a cruft pack, the caller is able to retain additional
objects via the cruft pack, even if they would have otherwise been
pruned due to their age.
- If not generating a cruft pack, the caller is likewise able to
retain additional objects as loose.
A potential alternative here is to introduce a new mode to alter the
contents of the reachable pack instead of the cruft one. One could
imagine a new option to `pack-objects`, say `--extra-reachable-tips`
that does the same thing as above, adding the visited set of objects
along the traversal to the pack.
But this has the unfortunate side-effect of altering the reachability
closure of that pack. If parts of the unreachable object graph mentioned
by one or more of the "extra reachable tips" programs is not closed,
then the resulting pack won't be either. This makes it impossible in the
general case to write out reachability bitmaps for that pack, since
closure is a requirement there.
Instead, keep these unreachable objects in the cruft pack (or set of
unreachable, loose objects) instead, to ensure that we can continue to
have a pack containing just reachable objects, which is always safe to
write a bitmap over.
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These were found with an automated CLI tool [1]. Only the
"Documentation" subfolder (and not source code files) was considered
because the docs are user-facing.
[1]: https://crates.io/crates/typos-cli
Signed-off-by: Linus Arver <linusa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In db9d67f2e9 (builtin/cat-file.c: support NUL-delimited input with
`-z`, 2022-07-22), we have introduced a new mode to read the input via
NUL-delimited records instead of newline-delimited records. This allows
the user to query for revisions that have newlines in their path
component. While unusual, such queries are perfectly valid and thus it
is clear that we should be able to support them properly.
Unfortunately, the commit only changed the input to be NUL-delimited,
but didn't change the output at the same time. While this is fine for
queries that are processed successfully, it is less so for queries that
aren't. In the case of missing commits for example the result can become
entirely unparsable:
```
$ printf "7ce4f05bae8120d9fa258e854a8669f6ea9cb7b1 blob 10\n1234567890\n\n\commit000" |
git cat-file --batch -z
7ce4f05bae blob 10
1234567890
commit missing
```
This is of course a crafted query that is intentionally gaming the
deficiency, but more benign queries that contain newlines would have
similar problems.
Ideally, we should have also changed the output to be NUL-delimited when
`-z` is specified to avoid this problem. As the input is NUL-delimited,
it is clear that the output in this case cannot ever contain NUL
characters by itself. Furthermore, Git does not allow NUL characters in
revisions anyway, further stressing the point that using NUL-delimited
output is safe. The only exception is of course the object data itself,
but as git-cat-file(1) prints the size of the object data clients should
read until that specified size has been consumed.
But even though `-z` has only been introduced a few releases ago in Git
v2.38.0, changing the output format retroactively to also NUL-delimit
output would be a backwards incompatible change. And while one could
make the argument that the output is inherently broken already, we need
to assume that there are existing users out there that use it just fine
given that revisions containing newlines are quite exotic.
Instead, introduce a new option `-Z` that switches to NUL-delimited
input and output. While this new option could arguably only switch the
output format to be NUL-delimited, the consequence would be that users
have to always specify both `-z` and `-Z` when the input may contain
newlines. On the other hand, if the user knows that there never will be
newlines in the input, they don't have to use either of those options.
There is thus no usecase that would warrant treating input and output
format separately, which is why we instead opt to "do the right thing"
and have `-Z` mean to NUL-terminate both formats.
The old `-z` option is marked as deprecated with a hint that its output
may become unparsable. It is thus hidden both from the synopsis as well
as the command's help output.
Co-authored-by: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git ls-files --format" can be used to format the output of
multiple file entries in the index, while "git ls-tree --format"
can be used to format the contents of a tree object. However,
the current set of %(objecttype), "(objectsize)", and
"%(objectsize:padded)" atoms supported by "git ls-files --format"
is a subset of what is available in "git ls-tree --format".
Users sometimes need to establish a unified view between the index
and tree, which can help with comparison or conversion between the two.
Therefore, this patch adds the missing atoms to "git ls-files --format".
"%(objecttype)" can be used to retrieve the object type corresponding
to a file in the index, "(objectsize)" can be used to retrieve the
object size corresponding to a file in the index, and "%(objectsize:padded)"
is the same as "(objectsize)", except with padded format.
Signed-off-by: ZheNing Hu <adlternative@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Since 5291828df8 (merge-ort: write $GIT_DIR/AUTO_MERGE whenever we hit a
conflict, 2021-03-20), when using the 'ort' merge strategy, the special
ref AUTO_MERGE is written when a merge operation results in conflicts.
This ref points to a tree recording the conflicted state of the working
tree and is very useful during conflict resolution. However, this ref is
not documented.
Add some documentation for AUTO_MERGE in git-diff(1), git-merge(1),
gitrevisions(7) and in the user manual.
In git-diff(1), mention it at the end of the description section, when
we mention that the command also accepts trees instead of commits, and
also add an invocation to the "Various ways to check your working tree"
example.
In git-merge(1), add a step to the list of things that happen "when it
is not obvious how to reconcile the changes", under the "True merge"
section. Also mention AUTO_MERGE in the "How to resolve conflicts"
section, when mentioning 'git diff'.
In gitrevisions(7), add a mention of AUTO_MERGE along with the other
special refs.
In the user manual, add a paragraph describing AUTO_MERGE to the
"Getting conflict-resolution help during a merge" section, and include
an example of a 'git diff AUTO_MERGE' invocation for the example
conflict used in that section. Note that for uniformity we do not use
backticks around AUTO_MERGE here since the rest of the document does not
typeset special refs differently.
Closes: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/issues/1471
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The "True merge" section of the 'git merge' documentation mentions that
in case of conflicts, the conflicted working tree files contain "the
result of the "merge" program". This probably refers to RCS's 'merge'
program, which is mentioned further down under "How conflicts are
presented".
Since it is not clear at that point of the document which program is
referred to, and since most modern readers probably do not relate to RCS
anyway, let's just write "the merge operation" instead.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some special refs, namely HEAD, FETCH_HEAD, ORIG_HEAD, MERGE_HEAD and
CHERRY_PICK_HEAD, are mentioned and described in 'gitrevisions', but some
others, namely REBASE_HEAD, REVERT_HEAD, and BISECT_HEAD, are not.
Add a small description of these special refs.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The special refs listed in 'gitrevisions' (under the '<refname>' entry)
are on separate lines in the Asciidoc source, but end up as a single
continuous paragraph in the rendered documentation (see e.g. [1]). In
following commits we will mention additional special refs, so to improve
legibility, use a description list such that every entry appears on its
own line. Since we are already in a description list, use ':::' as the
term delimiter.
In order for the new description list to be aligned with the description
under the '<refname>' entry, instead of being aligned with the last
entry of the "in the following rules" nested list, use the "ancestor
list continuation" syntax [2], i.e., leave an empty line before the
continuation '+'. Do the same for the paragraph following the new
description list ("Note that any...").
While at it, also use a continuation '+' before the "in the following
rules" list, for correctness. The parser seems not to care here, but
it's best to keep the sources correct.
[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/gitrevisions#Documentation/gitrevisions.txt-emltrefnamegtemegemmasterememheadsmasterememrefsheadsmasterem
[2] https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/lists/continuation/#ancestor-list-continuation
Suggested-by: Victoria Dye <vdye@github.com>
Based-on-patch-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Blain <levraiphilippeblain@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While well-established, the output format of ls-remote was not actually
documented. This patch adds an OUTPUT section to the documentation
following the format of git-show-ref.txt (which has similar semantics).
Add a basic example immediately after this to solidify the 'normal'
output format.
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While it's good to have several examples to solidify the output pattern
and generally demonstrate how to use the command, most other EXAMPLES
sections (e.g., git-show-branch.txt, git-remote.txt) additionally
describe the problem/situation to which the example is applicable.
Follow this example in the ls-remote documentation.
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without `--refs`, this command will show peeled tags. Make this clearer
in the examples to further mitigate the possibility of surprises in
consuming scripts.
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --tags option is already demonstrated in the later example that
lists version-patterned tags. As it doesn't appear to add anything to
the documentation, it ought to be removed to keep the documentation
easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The glossary defines 'ref' as the official name of the thing,
and the output from "git grep -e '<ref' Documentation/" shows
that most everybody uses <ref>, not <reference>. In addition,
the page already says <ref> in its SYNOPSIS section for the
command when it is used in the mode to follow the reflogs.
Strictly speaking, many references of these should be updated to
<commit> after adding an explanation on how these <commit>s are
discovered (i.e. we take <rev>, <glob>, or <ref> and starting from
these commits, follow their ancestry or reflog entries to list
commits), but that would be a lot bigger change I would rather not
to do in this patch, whose primary purpose is to make the existing
documentation more consistent.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
- Use inline-code syntax for options where appropriate.
- Use code blocks to clarify output format.
- Use 'OID' (for 'object ID') instead of 'SHA-1' as we support
different hashing algorithms these days.
Signed-off-by: Sean Allred <allred.sean@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Extend DWIM to try to infer `--orphan` when in an empty repository. i.e.
a repository with an invalid/unborn HEAD, no local branches, and if
`--guess-remote` is used then no remote branches.
This behavior is equivalent to `git switch -c` or `git checkout -b` in
an empty repository.
Also warn the user (overriden with `-f`/`--force`) when they likely
intend to checkout a remote branch to the worktree but have not yet
fetched from the remote. i.e. when using `--guess-remote` and there is a
remote but no local or remote refs.
Current Behavior:
% git --no-pager branch --list --remotes
% git remote
origin
% git workree add ../main
hint: If you meant to create a worktree containing a new orphan branch
[...]
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.worktreeAddOrphan false"
fatal: invalid reference: HEAD
% git workree add --guess-remote ../main
hint: If you meant to create a worktree containing a new orphan branch
[...]
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.worktreeAddOrphan false"
fatal: invalid reference: HEAD
% git fetch --quiet
% git --no-pager branch --list --remotes
origin/HEAD -> origin/main
origin/main
% git workree add --guess-remote ../main
Preparing worktree (new branch 'main')
branch 'main' set up to track 'origin/main'.
HEAD is now at dadc8e6dac commit message
%
New Behavior:
% git --no-pager branch --list --remotes
% git remote
origin
% git workree add ../main
No possible source branch, inferring '--orphan'
Preparing worktree (new branch 'main')
% git worktree remove ../main
% git workree add --guess-remote ../main
fatal: No local or remote refs exist despite at least one remote
present, stopping; use 'add -f' to overide or fetch a remote first
% git workree add --guess-remote -f ../main
No possible source branch, inferring '--orphan'
Preparing worktree (new branch 'main')
% git worktree remove ../main
% git fetch --quiet
% git --no-pager branch --list --remotes
origin/HEAD -> origin/main
origin/main
% git workree add --guess-remote ../main
Preparing worktree (new branch 'main')
branch 'main' set up to track 'origin/main'.
HEAD is now at dadc8e6dac commit message
%
Signed-off-by: Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a new advice/hint in `git worktree add` for when the user
tries to create a new worktree from a reference that doesn't exist.
Current Behavior:
% git init foo
Initialized empty Git repository in /path/to/foo/
% touch file
% git -C foo commit -q -a -m "test commit"
% git -C foo switch --orphan norefbranch
% git -C foo worktree add newbranch/
Preparing worktree (new branch 'newbranch')
fatal: invalid reference: HEAD
%
New Behavior:
% git init --bare foo
Initialized empty Git repository in /path/to/foo/
% touch file
% git -C foo commit -q -a -m "test commit"
% git -C foo switch --orphan norefbranch
% git -C foo worktree add newbranch/
Preparing worktree (new branch 'newbranch')
hint: If you meant to create a worktree containing a new orphan branch
hint: (branch with no commits) for this repository, you can do so
hint: using the --orphan option:
hint:
hint: git worktree add --orphan newbranch/
hint:
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.worktreeAddOrphan false"
fatal: invalid reference: HEAD
% git -C foo worktree add -b newbranch2 new_wt/
Preparing worktree (new branch 'newbranch')
hint: If you meant to create a worktree containing a new orphan branch
hint: (branch with no commits) for this repository, you can do so
hint: using the --orphan option:
hint:
hint: git worktree add --orphan -b newbranch2 new_wt/
hint:
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.worktreeAddOrphan false"
fatal: invalid reference: HEAD
%
Signed-off-by: Jacob Abel <jacobabel@nullpo.dev>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
