Fix a bug where the scissors line is placed after the Conflicts:
section, in the case where a merge conflict occurs and
commit.cleanup = scissors.
Helped-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes a bug where the scissors line is placed after the Conflicts:
section, in the case where a merge conflict occurs and
commit.cleanup = scissors.
Next, if commit.cleanup = scissors is specified, don't produce a
scissors line in commit if one already exists in the MERGE_MSG file.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This change allows git-merge messages to be cleaned up with the
commit.cleanup configuration or --cleanup option, just like how
git-commit does it.
We also give git-pull the option of --cleanup so that it can also take
advantage of this change.
Finally, add testing to ensure that messages are properly cleaned up.
Note that some newlines that were added to the commit message were
removed so that if a file were read via -F, it would be copied
faithfully.
Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 5e3548ef16 ("fetch: send server options when using protocol v2",
2018-04-24) taught "fetch" the ability to send server options when using
protocol v2, but not "clone". This ability is triggered by "-o" or
"--server-option".
Teach "clone" the same ability, except that because "clone" already
has "-o" for another parameter, teach "clone" only to receive
"--server-option".
Explain in the documentation, both for clone and for fetch, that server
handling of server options are server-specific. This is similar to
receive-pack's handling of push options - currently, they are just sent
to hooks to interpret as they see fit.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When cherry-picking or reverting a sequence of commits and if the final
pick/revert has conflicts and the user uses `git commit` to commit the
conflict resolution and does not run `git cherry-pick --continue` then
the sequencer state is left behind. This can cause problems later. In my
case I cherry-picked a sequence of commits the last one of which I
committed with `git commit` after resolving some conflicts, then a while
later, on a different branch I aborted a revert which rewound my HEAD to
the end of the cherry-pick sequence on the previous branch. Avoid this
potential problem by removing the sequencer state if we're committing or
resetting the final pick in a sequence.
Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git multi-pack-index verify" did not scale well with the number of
packfiles, which is being improved.
* jh/midx-verify-too-many-packs:
midx: during verify group objects by packfile to speed verification
midx: add progress indicators in multi-pack-index verify
trace2:data: add trace2 data to midx
progress: add sparse mode to force 100% complete message
"git format-patch" used overwrite an existing patch/cover-letter
file. A new "--no-clobber" option stops it.
* jc/format-patch-error-check:
format-patch: notice failure to open cover letter for writing
builtin/log: downcase the beginning of error messages
"git init" forgot to read platform-specific repository
configuration, which made Windows port to ignore settings of
core.hidedotfiles, for example.
* js/init-db-update-for-mingw:
mingw: respect core.hidedotfiles = false in git-init again
Robin reported that
git submodule foreach --quiet git pull --quiet origin
is not really quiet anymore [1]. "git pull" behaves as if --quiet is not
given.
This happens because parseopt in submodule--helper will try to parse
both --quiet options as if they are foreach's options, not git-pull's.
The parsed options are removed from the command line. So when we do
pull later, we execute just this
git pull origin
When calling submodule helper, adding "--" in front of "git pull" will
stop parseopt for parsing options that do not really belong to
submodule--helper foreach.
PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN is removed as a safety measure. parseopt should
never see unknown options or something has gone wrong. There are also
a couple usage string update while I'm looking at them.
While at it, I also add "--" to other subcommands that pass "$@" to
submodule--helper. "$@" in these cases are paths and less likely to be
--something-like-this. But the point still stands, git-submodule has
parsed and classified what are options, what are paths. submodule--helper
should never consider paths passed by git-submodule to be options even
if they look like one.
The test case is also contributed by Robin.
[1] it should be quiet before fc1b9243cd (submodule: port submodule
subcommand 'foreach' from shell to C, 2018-05-10) because parseopt
can't accidentally eat options then.
Reported-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Tested-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When passing a tag as the first argument to `git replace --graft`,
it can be useful to accept it and use the underlying commit as a
the commit that will be replaced.
This already works for lightweight tags, but unfortunately
for annotated tags we have been using the hash of the tag object
instead of the hash of the underlying commit.
Especially we would pass the hash of the tag object to
replace_object_oid() where we would likely fail with an error
like:
"error: Objects must be of the same type.
'annotated_replaced_object' points to a replaced object of type 'tag'
while 'replacement' points to a replacement object of type 'commit'."
This patch fixes that by using the hash of the underlying commit
when an annotated tag is passed.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When passing a tag as a parent argument to `git replace --graft`,
it can be useful to accept it and use the underlying commit as a
parent.
This already works for lightweight tags, but unfortunately
for annotated tags we have been using the hash of the tag object
instead of the hash of the underlying commit as a parent in the
replacement object we create.
This created invalid objects, but the replace succeeded even if
it showed an error like:
error: object A is a tag, not a commit
This patch fixes that by using the hash of the underlying commit
when an annotated tag is passed.
While at it, let's also update an error message to make it
clearer.
Reviewed-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is useful when investigating performance of pushes, and other times
when no progress information is written (because the pack is written to
stdout).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Robert Dailey reported confusion on the mailing list about a nested
tag which was most likely created by mistake. Jeff King noted that
this isn't a very common case and creating a tag-to-a-tag can be a
user-error.
Suggest that it may be a mistake with an advice message when
creating such a tag. Those who do want to create a tag that point
at another tag regularly can turn it off with the usual advice
mechanism.
Reported-by: Robert Dailey <rcdailey.lists@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Helped-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
[jc: fixed test style and tweaked the log message]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 7c0fe330d5 (rev-list: handle missing tree objects properly,
2018-10-05) taught the traversal machinery used by git-rev-list to
ignore missing trees, so that rev-list could handle them itself.
However, it does so only by checking via oid_object_info_extended() that
the object exists at all. This can miss several classes of errors that
were previously detected by rev-list:
- type mismatches (e.g., we expected a tree but got a blob)
- failure to read the object data (e.g., due to bitrot on disk)
This is especially important because we use "rev-list --objects" as our
connectivity check to admit new objects to the repository, and it will
now miss these cases (though the bitrot one is less important here,
because we'd typically have just hashed and stored the object).
There are a few options to fix this:
1. we could check these properties in rev-list when we do the existence
check. This is probably too expensive in practice (perhaps even for
a type check, but definitely for checking the whole content again,
which implies loading each object into memory twice).
2. teach the traversal machinery to differentiate between a missing
object, and one that could not be loaded as expected. This probably
wouldn't be too hard to detect type mismatches, but detecting bitrot
versus a truly missing object would require deep changes to the
object-loading code.
3. have the traversal machinery communicate the failure to the caller,
so that it can decide how to proceed without re-evaluting the object
itself.
Of those, I think (3) is probably the best path forward. However, this
patch does none of them. In the name of expediently fixing the
regression to a normal "rev-list --objects" that we use for connectivity
checks, this simply restores the pre-7c0fe330d5 behavior of having the
traversal die as soon as it fails to load a tree (when --missing is set
to MA_ERROR, which is the default).
Note that we can't get rid of the object-existence check in
finish_object(), because this also handles blobs (which are not
otherwise checked at all by the traversal code).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous commit made 'git add' abort when given a repository that
doesn't have a commit checked out. However, the output upon failure
isn't appropriate:
% git add repo
warning: adding embedded git repository: repo
hint: You've added another git repository inside your current repository.
hint: [...]
error: unable to index file 'repo/'
fatal: adding files failed
The hint doesn't apply in this case, and the error message doesn't
tell the user why 'repo' couldn't be added to the index.
Provide better output by teaching add_to_index() to error when given a
git directory where HEAD can't be resolved. To avoid the embedded
repository warning and hint, call check_embedded_repo() only after
add_file_to_index() succeeds because, in general, its output doesn't
make sense if adding to the index fails.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Meyer <kyle@kyleam.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git rebase --rebase-merges" replaces its old "--preserve-merges"
option; the latter is now marked as deprecated.
* js/rebase-deprecate-preserve-merges:
rebase: deprecate --preserve-merges
"git worktree add" used to do a "find an available name with stat
and then mkdir", which is race-prone. This has been fixed by using
mkdir and reacting to EEXIST in a loop.
* ms/worktree-add-atomic-mkdir:
worktree: fix worktree add race
Use oideq() instead of !oidcmp(), as it is more idiomatic, and might
give the compiler more opportunities to optimize.
Patch generated with 'contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci' and Coccinelle
v1.0.7 (previous Coccinelle versions don't notice this).
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use the macro FREE_AND_NULL to release memory allocated for
'head_name' and clear its pointer.
Patch generated with 'contrib/coccinelle/free.cocci' and Coccinelle
v1.0.7 (previous Coccinelle versions don't notice this).
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 'git blame' is invoked without specifying the commit to start
blaming from, it starts from the given file's state in the work tree.
However, when invoked in a bare repository without a start commit,
then there is no work tree state to start from, and it dies with the
following error message:
$ git rev-parse --is-bare-repository
true
$ git blame file.c
fatal: this operation must be run in a work tree
This is misleading, because it implies that 'git blame' doesn't work
in bare repositories at all, but it does, in fact, work just fine when
it is given a commit to start from.
We could improve the error message, of course, but let's just default
to HEAD in a bare repository instead, as most likely that is what the
user wanted anyway (if they wanted to start from an other commit, then
they would have specified that in the first place).
'git annotate' is just a thin wrapper around 'git blame', so in the
same situation it printed the same misleading error message, and this
patch fixes it, too.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
struct stat_data and struct cache_time both use unsigned ints for all
their members. However the format string for 'git ls-files --debug'
currently uses %d for formatting these numbers. This means that we
potentially print these values incorrectly if they are greater than
INT_MAX.
This has been the case since the --debug option was introduced in 'git
ls-files' in 8497421715 ("ls-files: learn a debugging dump format",
2010-07-31).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
struct diff_filespec defines mode to be an 'unsigned short'. Several
other places in the API which we'd like to interact with using a
diff_filespec used a plain unsigned (or unsigned int). This caused
problems when taking addresses, so switch to unsigned short.
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Wrap usage line at '<tagname>'. Also, wrap strings with '\n' at the end
of string fragments instead of at the beginning of the next string
fragment.
Convert a space-indent into a tab-indent for style.
Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Switching and creating branches always involves knowing the
<start-point> to begin the new branch from. Sometimes, people want to
create a new branch that does not have any commits yet; --orphan is a
flag to allow that.
--orphan overrides the default of HEAD for <start-point> instead causing
us to start from an empty history with all tracked files removed from
the index and working tree. The use of --orphan is incompatible with
specifying a <start-point>.
A note on the implementation. An alternative is just create a dummy
commit in-core with empty tree and switch to it. But there's a chance
the commit's SHA-1 may end up somewhere permanent like reflog. It's best
to make sure "commit" pointer is NULL to avoid it.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Unless you know what you're doing, switching to another branch to do
something then switching back could be confusing. Worse, you may even
forget that you're in the middle of something. By the time you realize,
you may have done a ton of work and it gets harder to go back.
A new option --ignore-in-progress was considered but dropped because it
was not exactly clear what should happen. Sometimes you can switch away
and get back safely and resume the operation. Sometimes not. And the
git-checkout behavior is automatically clear merge/revert/cherry-pick,
which makes it a bit even more confusing [1].
We may revisit and add this option in the future. But for now play it
safe and not allow it (you can't even skip this check with --force). The
user is suggested to cancel the operation by themselves (and hopefully
they do consider the consequences, not blindly type the command), or to
create a separate worktree instead of switching. The third option is
the good old "git checkout", but it's not mentioned.
[1] CACsJy8Axa5WsLSjiscjnxVK6jQHkfs-gH959=YtUvQkWriAk5w@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we switch from one branch to another, it makes sense to show a
summary of local changes since there could be conflicts, or some files
left modified.... When switch is used solely for creating a new
branch (and "switch" to the same commit) or detaching, we don't really
need to show anything.
"git checkout" does it anyway for historical reasons. But we can start
with a clean slate with switch and don't have to.
This essentially reverts fa655d8411 (checkout: optimize "git checkout
-b <new_branch>" - 2018-08-16) and make it default for switch,
but also for -B and --detach. Users of big repos are encouraged to
move to switch.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is already the default in git-checkout. The real change in here is
just minor cleanup. The main excuse is to explain why dwim is kept default.
Contrary to detach mode that is easy to get into and confusing to get
back out. Automatically creating a tracking branch often does not kick
in as often (you would need a branch of the same name on a remote). And
since the branch creation is reported clearly, the user should be able
to undo/delete it if it's unwanted.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout" automatically detaches branches and --detach is not
that useful (--no-detach is more likely). But for "switch", you
may want to use it more often once you're used to detached HEAD. This
of course adds -d to git-checkout but it does not harm (yet?) to do it.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout <commit>" will checkout the commit in question and
detach HEAD from the current branch. It is naturally a right thing to
do once you get git references. But detached HEAD is a scary concept
to new users because we show a lot of warnings and stuff, and it could
be hard to get out of (until you know better).
To keep switch a bit more friendly to new users, we only allow
entering detached HEAD mode when --detach is given. "git
switch" must take a branch (unless you create a new branch,
then of course switch can take any commit-ish)
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout" can be executed without any arguments. What it does is
not exactly great: it switches from HEAD to HEAD and shows worktree
modification as a side effect.
Make switch reject this case. Just use "git status" if you want
that side effect. For switch, you have to either
- really switch a branch
- (explicitly) detach from the current branch
- create a new branch
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This command is about switching branch (or creating a new one) and
should not accept pathspec. This helps simplify ambiguation
handling. The other two ("git checkout" and "git restore") of
course do accept pathspec as before.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This option is ancient. Nowadays reflog is enabled by default and
automatically created for new branches. Keep it in git-checkout only.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
--discard-changes is a better name than --force for this option since
it's what really happens. --force is turned to an alias for
--discard-changes. But it's meant to be an alias for potentially more
force options in the future.
Side note. It's not obvious from the patch but --discard-changes also
affects submodules if --recurse-submodules is used. The knob to force
updating submodules is hidden behind unpack-trees.c
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The shortcut of these options do not make much sense when used with
switch. And their descriptions are also tied to checkout. Move -b/-B
to cmd_checkout() and new -c/-C with the same functionality in
cmd_switch_branch()
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git checkout" doing too many things is a source of confusion for many
users (and it even bites old timers sometimes). To remedy that, the
command will be split into two new ones: switch and restore. The good
old "git checkout" command is still here and will be until all (or most
of users) are sick of it.
See the new man page for the final design of switch. The actual
implementation though is still pretty much the same as "git checkout"
and not completely aligned with the man page. Following patches will
adjust their behavior to match the man page.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is a preparation step for introducing new commands that do parts
of what checkout does. There will be two new commands, one is about
switching branches, detaching HEAD... one about checking out
paths. These share the a subset of command line options. The rest of
command line options are separate.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These local variables are referenced by struct option[]. This struct
will soon be broken down, moved away and we can't rely on local
variables anymore. Move these two to struct checkout_opts in
preparation for that.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"opts" will soon be moved out of cmd_checkout(). To keep changes in
that patch smaller, convert "opts" to a pointer and keep the real
thing behind "real_opts".
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This is in preparation for the new command restore, which also
needs to parse opts->source_tree but does not need all the
disambiguation logic.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The include list becomes very long and frankly a bit unorganized. With
the exception of builtin.h, cache.h or git-compat-util.h which have to
come first, keep the rest sorted.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After a successful switch, if a merge, cherry-pick or revert is ongoing,
it is canceled. This behavior has been with us from the very early
beginning, soon after git-merge was created but never actually
documented [1]. It may be a good idea to be transparent and tell the
user if some operation is canceled.
I consider this a better way of telling the user than just adding a
sentence or two in git-checkout.txt, which will be mostly ignored
anyway.
PS. Originally I wanted to print more details like
warning: cancelling an in-progress merge from <SHA-1>
which may allow some level of undo if the user wants to. But that seems
a lot more work. Perhaps it can be improved later if people still want
that.
[1] ... and I will try not to argue whether it is a sensible behavior.
There is some more discussion here if people are interested:
CACsJy8Axa5WsLSjiscjnxVK6jQHkfs-gH959=YtUvQkWriAk5w@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When 'git index-pack' is run by 'git clone', its check_objects()
function usually doesn't take long enough to be a concern, but I just
run into a situation where it took about a minute or so: I
inadvertently put some memory pressure on my tiny laptop while cloning
linux.git, and then there was quite a long silence between the
"Resolving deltas" and "Checking connectivity" progress bars.
Show a progress bar during the loop of check_objects() to let the user
know that something is still going on.
Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't redundantly run "git reflog expire --all" when gc.reflogExpire
and gc.reflogExpireUnreachable are set to "never", and die immediately
if those configuration valuer are bad.
As an earlier "assert lack of early exit" change to the tests for "git
reflog expire" shows, an early check of gc.reflogExpire{Unreachable,}
isn't wanted in general for "git reflog expire", but it makes sense
for "gc" because:
1) Similarly to 8ab5aa4bd8 ("parseopt: handle malformed --expire
arguments more nicely", 2018-04-21) we'll now die early if the
config variables are set to invalid values.
We run "pack-refs" before "reflog expire", which can take a while,
only to then die on an invalid gc.reflogExpire{Unreachable,}
configuration.
2) Not invoking the command at all means it won't show up in trace
output, which makes what's going on more obvious when the two are
set to "never".
3) As a later change documents we lock the refs when looping over the
refs to expire, even in cases where we end up doing nothing due to
this config.
For the reasons noted in the earlier "assert lack of early exit"
change I don't think it's worth it to bend over backwards in "git
reflog expire" itself to carefully detect if we'll really do
nothing given the combination of all its possible options and skip
that locking, but that's easy to detect here in "gc" where we'll
only run "reflog expire" in a relatively simple mode.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Change "commit-graph verify" to error on open() failures other than
ENOENT. As noted in the third paragraph of 283e68c72f ("commit-graph:
add 'verify' subcommand", 2018-06-27) and the test it added it's
intentional that "commit-graph verify" doesn't error out when the file
doesn't exist.
But let's not be overly promiscuous in what we accept. If we can't
read the file for other reasons, e.g. permission errors, bad file
descriptor etc. we'd like to report an error to the user.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier change implemented load_commit_graph_one_fd_st() in a way
that was bug-compatible with earlier code in terms of the "graph file
%s is too small" error message printing out the path to the
commit-graph (".git/objects/info/commit-graph").
But change that, because:
* A function that takes an already-open file descriptor also needing
the filename isn't very intuitive.
* The vast majority of errors we might emit when loading the graph
come from parse_commit_graph(), which doesn't report the
filename. Let's not do that either in this case for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
