"new safer autocrlf handling":
- Check if eols in a file are converted at commit, when the file has
CR (or CRLF) in the repo (technically speaking in the index).
- Add a test-file repoMIX with mixed line-endings.
- When converting LF->CRLF or CRLF->LF: check the warnings
checkout_files():
- Checking out CRLF_nul and checking for eol coversion does not
make much sense (CRLF will stay CRLF).
- Use the file LF_nul instead: It is handled a binary in "auto" modes,
and when declared as text the LF may be replaced with CRLF, depending
on the configuration.
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Perforce allows client side file/directory remapping through
the use of the client view definition that is part of the
user's client spec.
To support this functionality while branch detection is
enabled it is important to determine the branch location in
the workspace such that the correct files are patched before
Perforce submission. Perforce provides a command that
facilitates this process: p4 where.
This patch does two things to fix improve file location
detection when git-p4 has branch detection and use of client
spec enabled:
1. Enable usage of "p4 where" when Perforce branches exist
in the git repository, even when client specification is
used. This makes use of the already existing function
p4Where.
2. Allow identifying partial matches of the branch's depot
path while processing the output of "p4 where". For
robustness, paths will only match if ending in "/...".
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
$GIT_DIR/info/exclude and core.excludesfile (which falls back to
$XDG_HOME/git/ignore) are both ways to override the ignore pattern
lists given by the project in .gitignore files. The former, which
is per-repository personal preference, should take precedence over
the latter, which is a personal preference default across different
repositories that are accessed from that machine. The existing
documentation also agrees.
However, the precedence order was screwed up between these two from
the very beginning when 896bdfa2 (add: Support specifying an
excludes file with a configuration variable, 2007-02-27) introduced
core.excludesfile variable.
Noticed-by: Yohei Endo <yoheie@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If you have staged contents in your index and run "stash
apply", we may hit a conflict and put new entries into the
index. Recovering to your original state is difficult at
that point, because tools like "git reset --keep" will blow
away anything staged. We can make this safer by refusing to
apply when there are staged changes.
It's possible we could provide better tooling here, as "git
stash apply" should be writing only conflicts to the index
(so we know that any stage-0 entries are potentially
precious). But it is the odd duck; most "mergy" commands
will update the index for cleanly merged entries, and it is
not worth updating our tooling to support this use case
which is unlikely to be of interest (besides which, we would
still need to block a dirty index for "stash apply --index",
since that case _would_ be ambiguous).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
One of the tests in t3903 wants to make sure that applying a
stash that touches only "file" can still happen even if there
are working tree changes to "other-file". To do so, it adds
"other-file" to the index (since otherwise it is an
untracked file, voiding the purpose of the test).
But as we are about to refactor the dirty-index handling,
and as this test does not actually care about having a dirty
index (only a dirty working tree), let's bump the tracking
of "other-file" into the setup phase, so we can have _just_
a dirty working tree here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When testing the diff output of "git stash list", we look
for the stash's subject of "WIP on master: $sha1", even
though it's not relevant to the diff output. This makes the
test brittle to refactoring, as any changes to earlier tests
may impact the commit sha1.
Since we don't care about the commit subject here, we can
simply ask stash not to print it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add failing scenario when branch detection (--detect-branches) is
enabled together with use client spec (--use-client-spec). In this
specific scenario git-p4 will break when the Perforce client view
removes part of the depot path, as in the following example:
//depot/branch1/base/... //client/branch1/...
The test case also includes an extra sub-file mapping to enforce
robustness check of git-p4's client view support:
//depot/branch1/base/dir/sub_file1 //client/branch1/sub_file1
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test fixes.
* jk/test-annoyances:
t5551: make EXPENSIVE test cheaper
t5541: move run_with_cmdline_limit to test-lib.sh
t: pass GIT_TRACE through Apache
t: redirect stderr GIT_TRACE to descriptor 4
t: translate SIGINT to an exit
An earlier update to the parser that disects an address broke an
address, followed by a colon, followed by an empty string (instead
of the port number).
* tb/connect-ipv6-parse-fix:
connect.c: ignore extra colon after hostname
Test fixes for git-p4.
* va/fix-git-p4-tests:
t9814: guarantee only one source exists in git-p4 copy tests
git-p4: fix copy detection test
t9814: fix broken shell syntax in git-p4 rename test
Simply running "p4 changes" on a large branch can result in a "too
many rows scanned" error from the Perforce server. It is better to
use a sequence of smaller calls to "p4 changes", using the "-m"
option to limit the size of each call.
Signed-off-by: Lex Spoon <lex@lexspoon.org>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old message did not mention the :regex:file form.
To avoid overly long lines, split the message into two lines (in case
item->string is long, it will be the only part truncated in a narrow
terminal).
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Tested on Gentoo and OpenSUSE 13.1, both x86-64
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
t0027 expects the native end-of-lines to be a single line feed
character. On Windows, however, we set it to a carriage return
character followed by a line feed character. Thus, we have to
modify t0027 to expect different warnings depending on the
end-of-line markers.
Adjust the check of the warnings and use these macros:
WILC: Warn if LF becomes CRLF
WICL: Warn if CRLF becomes LF
WAMIX: Mixed line endings: either CRLF->LF or LF->CRLF
Improve the information given by check_warning().
Use test_cmp to show which warning is missing (or shouldn't be
there).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make more clear what the tests are doing:
commit_check_warn():
Commit files and checks for conversion warnings.
Old name: create_file_in_repo()
checkout_files():
Checkout files from the repo and check if they have
the appropriate line endings in the work space.
Old name: check_files_in_ws()
Replace non-leading TABS with spaces
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When commit fe8e3b7 refactored type_from_string to allow
input that was not NUL-terminated, it switched to using
strncmp instead of strcmp. But this means we check only the
first "len" bytes of the strings, and ignore any remaining
bytes in the object_type_string. We should make sure that it
is also "len" bytes, or else we would accept "comm" as
"commit", and so forth.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The old description is rather clearly a wrong cut-and-paste from
t2016-checkout-patch.sh.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test passes if one replaces the 'e' command with a 'y' command in
the 'add -p' session.
Reported-by: Tanky Woo <wtq1990@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The second argument to test_path_is_file and test_path_is_dir
must be $2 and not $*, which instead would repeat the file
name in the error message.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some text editors like Notepad or LibreOffice write an UTF-8 BOM in
order to indicate that the file is Unicode text rather than whatever the
current locale would indicate.
If someone uses such an editor to edit a gitignore file, we are left
with those three bytes at the beginning of the file. If we do not skip
them, we will attempt to match a filename with the BOM as prefix, which
won't match the files the user is expecting.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In t1430, we check whether deleting the branch "../../foo"
will delete ".git/foo". However, this is not that
interesting a test; the precious file ".git/foo" does not
look like a ref, so even if we did not notice the "escape"
from the "refs/" hierarchy, we would fail for that reason
(i.e., if you turned refname_is_safe into a noop, the test
still passes).
Let's add an additional test for the same thing, but with a
file that actually looks like a ref. That will make sure we
are exercising the refname_is_safe code. While we're at it,
let's also make the code work a little harder by adding some
extra paths and some empty path components.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A push into an unborn branch, with "receive.denyCurrentBranch" set
to "updateInstead", did not check out the working tree as expected.
* jc/update-instead-into-void:
push-to-deploy: allow pushing into an unborn branch and updating it
By using a tree with multiple identical files and allowing copy detection to
choose any one of them, the check in the test is unnecessarily complex. We can
simplify by:
* Modify source file (file2) before copying the file.
* Check that only file2 is the source in the output of "p4 filelog".
* Remove all "case" statements and replace them with simple tests to check
that source is "file2".
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ignore an extra ':' at the end of the hostname in URL's like
"ssh://example.com:/path/to/repo"
The colon is meant to separate a port number from the hostname.
If the port is empty, the colon should be ignored, see RFC 3986.
It had been working for URLs with ssh:// scheme, but was unintentionally
broken in 86ceb3, "allow ssh://user@[2001:db8::1]/repo.git"
Reported-by: Reid Woodbury Jr. <reidw@rawsound.com>
Signed-off-by: Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
If a Perforce server is configured to automatically set +l
(exclusive lock) on add of certain file types, git p4 submit will
fail during getP4OpenedType, as the regex doesn't expect the
trailing '*exclusive*' from p4 opened:
//depot/file.png#1 - add default change (binary+l) *exclusive*
Signed-off-by: Blair Holloway <blair_holloway@playstation.sony.com>
Acked-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The test for handling of failure when trying to move a file
that is locked by another client was not quite correct - it
failed early on because the target file in the move already
existed.
The test now fails because git-p4 does not properly detect
that p4 has rejected the move, and instead just crashes. At
present, git-p4 has no support for detecting that a file
has been locked and reporting it to the user, so this is
the expected outcome.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Test script t9816-git-p4-locked.sh test #4 tests for
adding a file that is locked by Perforce automatically.
This is currently not supported by git-p4 and so is
expected to fail.
However, a small typo meant it always failed, even with
a fixed git-p4. Fix the typo to resolve this.
Signed-off-by: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Setting receive.denycurrentbranch to updateinstead and pushing into
the current branch, when the working tree and the index is truly
clean, is supposed to reset the working tree and the index to match
the tree of the pushed commit. This did not work when pushing into
an unborn branch.
The code that drives push-to-checkout hook needs no change, as the
interface is defined so that hook can decide what to do when the
push is coming to an unborn branch and take an appropriate action
since the beginning.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
`git prune --worktrees` was pruning worktrees which were non-existent OR
expired, while it rather should prune those which are orphaned AND
expired, as git-checkout documentation describes. Fix it.
Add test 'not prune proper checkouts', which uses valid but expired
worktree.
Modify test 'not prune recent checkouts' to remove the worktree before
pruning - link in worktrees still must survive. In older form it is
useless because would pass always when the other test passes.
Signed-off-by: Max Kirillov <max@max630.net>
Acked-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The prompt script (in contrib/) did not show the untracked sign
when working in a subdirectory without any untracked files.
* ct/prompt-untracked-fix:
git prompt: use toplevel to find untracked files
"git fetch" that fetches a commit using the allow-tip-sha1-in-want
extension could have failed to fetch all the requested refs.
* jk/fetch-pack:
fetch-pack: remove dead assignment to ref->new_sha1
fetch_refs_via_pack: free extra copy of refs
filter_ref: make a copy of extra "sought" entries
filter_ref: avoid overwriting ref->old_sha1 with garbage
"git prune" used to largely ignore broken refs when deciding which
objects are still being used, which could spread an existing small
damage and make it a larger one.
* jk/prune-with-corrupt-refs:
refs.c: drop curate_packed_refs
repack: turn on "ref paranoia" when doing a destructive repack
prune: turn on ref_paranoia flag
refs: introduce a "ref paranoia" flag
t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository
File file11 is copied from file2 and diff-tree correctly reports
this file as its the source. But it is possible that the diff-tree
algorithm detects file10, which was also copied from file2, as the
origin of the new file.
This fix uses a case statement to support both files as the source
of file11, as was done in other tests in this file.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An update to the tests in 2.1 era introduced a broken case statements
that lack closing esac.
Signed-off-by: Vitor Antunes <vitor.hda@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The transfer.hiderefs support did not quite work for smart-http
transport.
* jk/smart-http-hide-refs:
upload-pack: do not check NULL return of lookup_unknown_object
upload-pack: fix transfer.hiderefs over smart-http
When a commit changes a path P that used to be a file to a directory
and creates a new path P/X in it, "git show" would say that file P
was removed and file P/X was created for such a commit.
However, if we compare two directories, D1 and D2, where D1 has a
file D1/P in it and D2 has a directory D2/P under which there is a
file D2/P/X, and ask "git diff --no-index D1 D2" to show their
differences, we simply get a refusal "file/directory conflict".
Surely, that may be what GNU diff does, but we can do better and it
is easy to do so.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
People often forget to chain the commands in their test together
with &&, leaving a failure from an earlier command in the test go
unnoticed. The new GIT_TEST_CHAIN_LINT mechanism allows you to
catch such a mistake more easily.
* jk/test-chain-lint: (36 commits)
t9001: drop save_confirm helper
t0020: use test_* helpers instead of hand-rolled messages
t: simplify loop exit-code status variables
t: fix some trivial cases of ignored exit codes in loops
t7701: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t3305: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t0020: fix ignored exit code inside loops
perf-lib: fix ignored exit code inside loop
t6039: fix broken && chain
t9158, t9161: fix broken &&-chain in git-svn tests
t9104: fix test for following larger parents
t4104: drop hand-rolled error reporting
t0005: fix broken &&-chains
t7004: fix embedded single-quotes
t0050: appease --chain-lint
t9001: use test_when_finished
t4117: use modern test_* helpers
t6034: use modern test_* helpers
t1301: use modern test_* helpers
t0020: use modern test_* helpers
...
"git diff --no-index" was supposed to be a poor-man's approach to
allow using Git diff goodies outside of a Git repository, without
having to patch mainstream diff implementations.
Unlike a POSIX diff that treats "diff D F" (or "diff F D") as a
request to compare D/F and F (or F and D/F) when D is a directory
and F is a file, however, we did not accept such a command line and
instead barfed with "file/directory conflict".
Imitate what POSIX diff does and append the basename of the file
after the name of the directory before comparing.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
"git prune" used to largely ignore broken refs when deciding which
objects are still being used, which could spread an existing small
damage and make it a larger one.
* jk/prune-with-corrupt-refs:
refs.c: drop curate_packed_refs
repack: turn on "ref paranoia" when doing a destructive repack
prune: turn on ref_paranoia flag
refs: introduce a "ref paranoia" flag
t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository
"git fetch" that fetches a commit using the allow-tip-sha1-in-want
extension could have failed to fetch all the requested refs.
* jk/fetch-pack:
fetch-pack: remove dead assignment to ref->new_sha1
fetch_refs_via_pack: free extra copy of refs
filter_ref: make a copy of extra "sought" entries
filter_ref: avoid overwriting ref->old_sha1 with garbage
"git log --graph --no-walk A B..." is a otcnflicting request that
asks nonsense; no-walk tells us show discrete points in the
history, while graph asks to draw connections between these
discrete points. Forbid the combination.
* dj/log-graph-with-no-walk:
revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
"git rev-list --bisect --first-parent" does not work (yet) and can
even cause SEGV; forbid it. "git log --bisect --first-parent"
would not be useful until "git bisect --first-parent" materializes,
so it is also forbidden for now.
* kd/rev-list-bisect-first-parent:
rev-list: refuse --first-parent combined with --bisect
The prompt script (in contrib/) did not show the untracked sign
when working in a subdirectory without any untracked files.
* ct/prompt-untracked-fix:
git prompt: use toplevel to find untracked files
The idea of this helper is that we want to save the current
value of a config variable and then restore it again after
the test completes. However, there's no point in actually
saving the value; it should always be restored to the string
"never" (which you can confirm by instrumenting
save_confirm to print the value it finds).
Let's just replace it with a single test_when_finished call.
Suggested-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder@ira.uka.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
