We have a test function to verify config files. Use it as it's more
precise.
Signed-off-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The submodule repo the test set up had the 'topic' branch checked out,
meaning the repo's default branch (HEAD) is the 'topic' branch.
The following tests then pretended to switch between the default branch
and the 'topic' branch. This was papered over by continually adding
commits to the 'topic' branch and checking if the submodule gets updated
to this new commit.
Return the submodule repo to the 'main' branch after setup so we can
actually test the switching behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
set-branch will return an error when setting the config fails so I don't
see why set-url shouldn't. Also skip the sync in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The commands need a path to a submodule but treated it as the name when
modifying the .gitmodules file, leading to confusion when a submodule's
name does not match its path.
Because calling submodule_from_path initializes the submodule cache, we
need to manually trigger a reread before syncing, as the cache is
missing the config change we just made.
Signed-off-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <heftig@archlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In graph_write() we store commits in an oidset, but never clean it up,
leaking the contents. We should clear it in the cleanup section.
The oidset comes from 6830c36077 (commit-graph.h: replace 'commit_hex'
with 'commits', 2020-04-13), but it was just replacing a string_list
that was also leaked. Curiously, we fixed the leak of some adjacent
variables in commit fa8953cb40 (builtin/commit-graph.c: extract
'read_one_commit()', 2020-05-18), but the oidset wasn't included for
some reason.
In combination with the preceding commits, this lets us mark t5324 as
leak-free.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 6c622f9f0b (commit-graph: write commit-graph chains, 2019-06-18)
added a base_graph_name string to the write_commit_graph_context struct.
But the end-of-function cleanup forgot to free it, causing a leak.
This (presumably in combination with the preceding leak-fixes) lets us
mark t5328 as leak-free.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing a split graph file, we replace the final element of the
commit_graph_hash_after and commit_graph_filenames_after arrays. But
since these are allocated strings, we need to free them before
overwriting to avoid leaking the old string.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When reading the graph chain file, we open (and allocate) each
individual slice it mentions and then add them to a linked-list chain.
But if adding to the chain fails (e.g., because the base-graph chunk it
contains didn't match what we expected), we leave the function without
freeing the graph struct that caused the failure, leaking it.
We can fix it by calling free_graph_commit().
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When adding a graph to a chain, we do some consistency checks and then
if everything looks good, set g->base_graph to add a link to the chain.
But when we added a new consistency check in 209250ef38 (commit-graph.c:
prevent overflow in add_graph_to_chain(), 2023-07-12), it comes _after_
we've already set g->base_graph. So we might return failure, even though
we actually added to the chain.
This hasn't caused a bug yet, because after failing to add to the chain,
we discard the failed graph struct completely, leaking it. But in order
to fix that, it's important that the struct be in a consistent and
predictable state after the failure.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When running "commit-graph verify", we call free_commit_graph(). That's
sufficient for the case of a single graph file, but if we loaded a chain
of split graph files, they form a linked list via the base_graph
pointers. We need to free all of them, or we leak all but the first
struct.
We can make this work by teaching free_commit_graph() to walk the
base_graph pointers and free each element. This in turn lets us simplify
close_commit_graph(), which does the same thing by recursion (we cannot
just use close_commit_graph() in "commit-graph verify", as the function
takes a pointer to an object store, and the verify command creates a
single one-off graph struct).
While indenting the code in free_commit_graph() for the loop, I noticed
that setting g->data to NULL is rather pointless, as we free the struct
a few lines later. So I cleaned that up while we're here.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When closing and freeing a commit-graph, the main entry point is
close_commit_graph(), which then uses close_commit_graph_one() to
recurse through the base_graph links and free each one.
Commit 957ba814bf (commit-graph: when closing the graph, also release
the slab, 2021-09-08) put the call to clear the slab into the recursive
function, but this is pointless: there's only a single global slab
variable. It works OK in practice because clearing the slab is
idempotent, but it makes the code harder to reason about and refactor.
Move it into the parent function so it's only called once (and there are
no other direct callers of the recursive close_commit_graph_one(), so we
are not hurting them).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We call repo_get_merge_bases(), which allocates a commit_list, but never
free the result, causing a leak.
The obvious solution is to free it, but we need to look at the contents
of the first item to decide whether to leave the loop. One option is to
free it in both code paths. But since the commit that the list points to
is longer-lived than the list itself, we can just dereference it
immediately, free the list, and then continue with the existing logic.
This is about the same amount of code, but keeps the list management all
in one place.
This lets us mark a number of merge-related test scripts as leak-free.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We loop over the set of commits to merge, and for each one compute the
merge base against the existing set of merge base candidates we've
found. Then we replace the candidate set with a simple assignment of the
list head, leaking the old list. We should free it first before
assignment.
This makes t5521 leak-free, so mark it as such.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test has never leaked since it was added. Let's annotate it to make
sure it stays that way (and to reduce noise when looking for other
leak-free scripts after we fix some leaks).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
5c387428f1 (parse-options: don't emit "ambiguous option" for aliases,
2019-04-29) added "updated_options" to struct parse_opt_ctx_t, but it
has never been used. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A small handful of the tests in t7700 (the main script for testing
functionality of 'git repack') are specifically related to cruft pack
operations.
Prepare for adding new cruft pack-related tests by moving the existing
set into a new test script.
Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
For now my strategy is simple. Create two identical repositories one
in each format. Use fixed timestamps. Verify the dynamically computed
compatibility objects from one repository match the objects stored in
the other repository.
A general limitation of this strategy is that the git when generating
signed tags and commits with compatObjectFormat enabled will generate
a signature for both formats. To overcome this limitation I have
added "test-tool delete-gpgsig" that when fed an signed commit or tag
with two signatures deletes one of the signatures.
With that in place I can have "git commit" and "git tag" generate
signed objects, have my tool delete one, and feed the new object
into "git hash-object" to create the kinds of commits and tags
git without compatObjectFormat enabled will generate.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the existing tests that are oid based to test that cat-file
works correctly with the normal oid and the compat_oid.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Before I extend this test, changing the naming of the relevant
hash from sha1 to oid. Calling the hash sha1 is incorrect today
as it can be either sha1 or sha256 depending on the value of
GIT_DEFAULT_HASH_FUNCTION when the test is called.
I plan to test sha1 and sha256 simultaneously in the same repository.
Having a name like sha1 will be even more confusing.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update cmd_ls_tree to call get_oid_with_context and pass
GET_OID_HASH_ANY instead of calling the simpler repo_get_oid.
This implments in ls-tree the behavior that asking to display a sha1
hash displays the corrresponding sha1 encoded object and asking to
display a sha256 hash displayes the corresponding sha256 encoded
object.
This is useful for testing the conversion of an object to an
equivlanet object encoded with a different hash function.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update check_object_signature to find the hash algorithm the exising
signature uses, and to use the same hash algorithm when recomputing it
to check the signature is valid.
This will be useful when teaching git ls-tree to display objects
encoded with the compat hash algorithm.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To make it possible for git ls-tree to display the tree encoded
in the hash algorithm of the oid specified to git ls-tree, update
init_tree_desc to take as a parameter the oid of the tree object.
Update all callers of init_tree_desc and init_tree_desc_gently
to pass the oid of the tree object.
Use the oid of the tree object to discover the hash algorithm
of the oid and store that hash algorithm in struct tree_desc.
Use the hash algorithm in decode_tree_entry and
update_tree_entry_internal to handle reading a tree object encoded in
a hash algorithm that differs from the repositories hash algorithm.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Use GET_OID_HASH_ANY when calling get_oid_with_context. This
implements the semi-obvious behaviour that specifying a sha1 oid shows
the output for a sha1 encoded object, and specifying a sha256 oid
shows the output for a sha256 encoded object.
This is useful for testing the the conversion of an object to an
equivalent object encoded with a different hash function.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The new --output-object-format parameter returns the oid in the
specified format.
This is a generally useful plumbing facility. It is useful for writing
test cases and for directly querying the translation maps.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a configuration option to enable updating and reading from
compatibility hash maps when git accesses the reposotiry.
Call the helper function repo_set_compat_hash_algo with the value
that compatObjectFormat is set to.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
oid_object_info_extended is updated to detect an oid encoding that
does not match the current repository, use repo_oid_to_algop to find
the correspoding oid in the current repository and to return the data
for the oid.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As mentioned in the hash function transition plan commit mergetag
lines need to be handled. The commit mergetag lines embed an entire
tag object in a commit object.
Keep the implementation sane if not fast by unembedding the tag
object, converting the tag object, and embedding the new tag object,
in the new commit object.
In the long run I don't expect any other approach is maintainable, as
tag objects may be extended in ways that require additional
translation.
To keep the implementation of convert_commit_object maintainable I
have modified convert_commit_object to process the lines in any order,
and to fail on unknown lines. We can't know ahead of time if a new
line might embed something that needs translation or not so it is
better to fail and require the code to be updated instead of silently
mistranslating objects.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing a commit object in a repository with both SHA-1 and
SHA-256, we'll need to convert our commit objects so that we can write
the hash values for both into the repository. To do so, let's add a
function to convert commit objects.
Read the commit object and map the tree value and any of the parent
values, and copy the rest of the commit through unmodified. Note that
we don't need to modify the signature headers, because they are the
same under both algorithms.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Upon close examination I discovered that while brian's code to convert
tag objects was functionally correct, it leaked memory.
Rearrange the code so that all error checking happens before any
memory is allocated.
Add code to release the temporary strbufs the code uses.
The code pretty much assumes the tag object ends with a newline,
so add an explict test to verify that is the case.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When writing a tag object in a repository with both SHA-1 and SHA-256,
we'll need to convert our commit objects so that we can write the hash
values for both into the repository. To do so, let's add a function to
convert tag objects.
Note that signatures for tag objects in the current algorithm trail the
message, and those for the alternate algorithm are in headers.
Therefore, we parse the tag object for both a trailing signature and a
header and then, when writing the other format, swap the two around.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the future, we're going to want to provide SHA-256 repositories that
have compatibility support for SHA-1 as well. In order to do so, we'll
need to be able to convert tree objects from SHA-256 to SHA-1 by writing
a tree with each SHA-256 object ID mapped to a SHA-1 object ID.
We implement a function, convert_tree_object, that takes an existing
tree buffer and writes it to a new strbuf, converting between
algorithms. Let's make this function generic, because while we only
need it to convert from the main algorithm to the compatibility
algorithm now, we may need to do the other way around in the future,
such as for transport.
We avoid reusing the code in decode_tree_entry because that code
normalizes data, and we don't want that here. We want to produce a
complete round trip of data, so if, for example, the old entry had a
wrongly zero-padded mode, we'd want to preserve that when converting to
ensure a stable hash value.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
builtin/fast-import.c and tree-walk.c have almost identical version of
get_mode. The two functions started out the same but have diverged
slightly. The version in fast-import changed mode to a uint16_t to
save memory. The version in tree-walk started erroring if no mode was
present.
As far as I can tell both of these changes are valid for both of the
callers, so add the both changes and place the common parsing helper
in object.h
Rename the helper from get_mode to parse_mode so it does not
conflict with another helper named get_mode in diff-no-index.c
This will be used shortly in a new helper decode_tree_entry_raw
which is used to compute cmpatibility objects as part of
the sha256 transition.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Currently, we always read a object ID of the current algorithm with
oidread. However, once we start converting objects, we'll need to
consider what happens when we want to read an object ID of a specific
algorithm, such as the compatibility algorithm. To make this easier,
let's define oidread_algop, which specifies which algorithm we should
use for our object ID, and define oidread in terms of it.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we write a tag the object oid is specific to the hash algorithm.
This matters when a tag is signed. The hash transition plan calls for
signatures on both the sha1 form and the sha256 form of the object,
and for both of those signatures to live in the tag object.
To generate tag object with multiple signatures, first compute the
unsigned form of the tag, and then if the tag is being signed compute
the unsigned form of the tag with the compatibilityr hash. Then
compute compute the signatures of both buffers.
Once the signatures are computed add them to both buffers. This
allows computing the compatibility hash in do_sign, saving
write_object_file the expense of recomputing the compatibility tag
just to compute it's hash.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rename add_commit_signature as add_header_signature, and expose it so
that it can be used for converting tags from one object format to
another.
Inspired-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It so happens that commit mergetag lines embed a tag object. So to
compute the compatible signature of a commit object that has mergetag
lines the compatible embedded tag must be computed first.
Implement this by duplicating and converting the commit extra headers
into the compatible version of the commit extra headers, that need
to be passed to commit_tree_extended.
To handle merge tags only the compatible extra headers need to be
computed.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we write a commit, we include data that is specific to the hash
algorithm, such as parents and the root tree. In order to write both a
SHA-1 commit and a SHA-256 version, we need to convert between them.
However, a straightforward conversion isn't necessarily what we want.
When we sign a commit, we sign its data, so if we create a commit for
SHA-256 and then write a SHA-1 version, we'll still have only signed the
SHA-256 data. While this is valid, it would be better to sign both
forms of data so people using SHA-1 can verify the signatures as well.
Consequently, we don't want to use the standard mapping that occurs when
we write an object. Instead, let's move most of the writing of the
commit into a separate function which is agnostic of the hash algorithm
and which simply writes into a buffer and specify both versions of the
object ourselves.
We can then call this function twice: once with the SHA-256 contents,
and if SHA-1 is enabled, once with the SHA-1 contents. If we're signing
the commit, we then sign both versions and append both signatures to
both buffers. To produce a consistent hash, we always append the
signatures in the order in which Git implemented them: first SHA-1, then
SHA-256.
In order to make this signing code work, we split the commit signing
code into two functions, one which signs the buffer, and one which
appends the signature.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To create the proper signatures for commit objects both versions of
the commit object need to be generated and signed. After that it is
a waste to throw away the work of generating the compatibility hash
so update write_object_file_flags to take a compatibility hash input
parameter that it can use to skip the work of generating the
compatability hash.
Update the places that don't generate the compatability hash to
pass NULL so it is easy to tell write_object_file_flags should
not attempt to use their compatability hash.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To implement SHA1 compatibility on SHA256 repositories the loose
object map needs to be updated whenver a loose object is written.
Updating the loose object map this way allows git to support
the old hash algorithm in constant time.
The functions write_loose_object, and stream_loose_object are
the only two functions that write to the loose object store.
Update stream_loose_object to compute the compatibiilty hash, update
the loose object, and then call repo_add_loose_object_map to update
the loose object map.
Update write_object_file_flags to convert the object into
it's compatibility encoding, hash the compatibility encoding,
write the object, and then update the loose object map.
Update force_object_loose to lookup the hash of the compatibility
encoding, write the loose object, and then update the loose object
map.
Update write_object_file_literally to convert the object into it's
compatibility hash encoding, hash the compatibility enconding, write
the object, and then update the loose object map, when the type string
is a known type. For objects with an unknown type this results in a
partially broken repository, as the objects are not mapped.
The point of write_object_file_literally is to generate a partially
broken repository for testing. For testing skipping writing the loose
object map is much more useful than refusing to write the broken
object at all.
Except that the loose objects are updated before the loose object map
I have not done any analysis to see how robust this scheme is in the
event of failure.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update loose_objects_cache when udpating the loose objects map. This
oidtree is used to discover which oids are possibilities when
resolving short names, and it can support a mixture of sha1
and sha256 oids.
With this any oid recorded objects/loose-objects-idx is usable
for resolving an oid to an object.
To make this maintainable a helper insert_loose_map is factored
out of load_one_loose_object_map and repo_add_loose_object_map,
and then modified to also update the loose_objects_cache.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As part of the transition plan, we'd like to add a file in the .git
directory that maps loose objects between SHA-1 and SHA-256. Let's
implement the specification in the transition plan and store this data
on a per-repository basis in struct repository.
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We currently have support for using a full stage 4 SHA-256
implementation. However, we'd like to support interoperability with
SHA-1 repositories as well. The transition plan anticipates a
compatibility hash algorithm configuration option that we can use to
implement support for this. Let's add an element to the repository
structure that indicates the compatibility hash algorithm so we can use
it when we need to consider interoperability between algorithms.
Add a helper function repo_set_compat_hash_algo that takes a
compatibility hash algorithm and sets "repo->compat_hash_algo". If
GIT_HASH_UNKNOWN is passed as the compatibility hash algorithm
"repo->compat_hash_algo" is set to NULL.
For now, the code results in "repo->compat_hash_algo" always being set
to NULL, but that will change once a configuration option is added.
Inspired-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Support short oids encoded in any algorithm, while ensuring enough of
the oid is specified to disambiguate between all of the oids in the
repository encoded in any algorithm.
By default have the code continue to only accept oids specified in the
storage hash algorithm of the repository, but when something is
ambiguous display all of the possible oids from any accepted oid
encoding.
A new flag is added GET_OID_HASH_ANY that when supplied causes the
code to accept oids specified in any hash algorithm, and to return the
oids that were resolved.
This implements the functionality that allows both SHA-1 and SHA-256
object names, from the "Object names on the command line" section of
the hash function transition document.
Care is taken in get_short_oid so that when the result is ambiguous
the output remains the same if GIT_OID_HASH_ANY was not supplied. If
GET_OID_HASH_ANY was supplied objects of any hash algorithm that match
the prefix are displayed.
This required updating repo_for_each_abbrev to give it a parameter so
that it knows to look at all hash algorithms.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While looking at how to handle input of both SHA-1 and SHA-256 oids in
get_oid_with_context, I realized that the oid_array in
repo_for_each_abbrev might have more than one kind of oid stored in it
simultaneously.
Update to oid_array_append to ensure that oids added to an oid array
always have an algorithm set.
Update void_hashcmp to first verify two oids use the same hash algorithm
before comparing them to each other.
With that oid-array should be safe to use with different kinds of
oids simultaneously.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Two basic functions are provided:
- convert_object_file Takes an object file it's type and hash algorithm
and converts it into the equivalent object file that would
have been generated with hash algorithm "to".
For blob objects there is no conversation to be done and it is an
error to use this function on them.
For commit, tree, and tag objects embedded oids are replaced by the
oids of the objects they refer to with those objects and their
object ids reencoded in with the hash algorithm "to". Signatures
are rearranged so that they remain valid after the object has
been reencoded.
- repo_oid_to_algop which takes an oid that refers to an object file
and returns the oid of the equivalent object file generated
with the target hash algorithm.
The pair of files object-file-convert.c and object-file-convert.h are
introduced to hold as much of this logic as possible to keep this
conversion logic cleanly separated from everything else and in the
hopes that someday the code will be clean enough git can support
compiling out support for sha1 and the various conversion functions.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A previous commit implemented the `gc.repackFilter` config option
to specify a filter that should be used by `git gc` when
performing repacks.
Another previous commit has implemented
`git repack --filter-to=<dir>` to specify the location of the
packfile containing filtered out objects when using a filter.
Let's implement the `gc.repackFilterTo` config option to specify
that location in the config when `gc.repackFilter` is used.
Now when `git gc` will perform a repack with a <dir> configured
through this option and not empty, the repack process will be
passed a corresponding `--filter-to=<dir>` argument.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A previous commit has implemented `git repack --filter=<filter-spec>` to
allow users to filter out some objects from the main pack and move them
into a new different pack.
It would be nice if this new different pack could be created in a
different directory than the regular pack. This would make it possible
to move large blobs into a pack on a different kind of storage, for
example cheaper storage.
Even in a different directory, this pack can be accessible if, for
example, the Git alternates mechanism is used to point to it. In fact
not using the Git alternates mechanism can corrupt a repo as the
generated pack containing the filtered objects might not be accessible
from the repo any more. So setting up the Git alternates mechanism
should be done before using this feature if the user wants the repo to
be fully usable while this feature is used.
In some cases, like when a repo has just been cloned or when there is no
other activity in the repo, it's Ok to setup the Git alternates
mechanism afterwards though. It's also Ok to just inspect the generated
packfile containing the filtered objects and then just move it into the
'.git/objects/pack/' directory manually. That's why it's not necessary
for this command to check that the Git alternates mechanism has been
already setup.
While at it, as an example to show that `--filter` and `--filter-to`
work well with other options, let's also add a test to check that these
options work well with `--max-pack-size`.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A previous commit has implemented `git repack --filter=<filter-spec>` to
allow users to filter out some objects from the main pack and move them
into a new different pack.
Users might want to perform such a cleanup regularly at the same time as
they perform other repacks and cleanups, so as part of `git gc`.
Let's allow them to configure a <filter-spec> for that purpose using a
new gc.repackFilter config option.
Now when `git gc` will perform a repack with a <filter-spec> configured
through this option and not empty, the repack process will be passed a
corresponding `--filter=<filter-spec>` argument.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This new option puts the objects specified by `<filter-spec>` into a
separate packfile.
This could be useful if, for example, some blobs take up a lot of
precious space on fast storage while they are rarely accessed. It could
make sense to move them into a separate cheaper, though slower, storage.
It's possible to find which new packfile contains the filtered out
objects using one of the following:
- `git verify-pack -v ...`,
- `test-tool find-pack ...`, which a previous commit added,
- `--filter-to=<dir>`, which a following commit will add to specify
where the pack containing the filtered out objects will be.
This feature is implemented by running `git pack-objects` twice in a
row. The first command is run with `--filter=<filter-spec>`, using the
specified filter. It packs objects while omitting the objects specified
by the filter. Then another `git pack-objects` command is launched using
`--stdin-packs`. We pass it all the previously existing packs into its
stdin, so that it will pack all the objects in the previously existing
packs. But we also pass into its stdin, the pack created by the previous
`git pack-objects --filter=<filter-spec>` command as well as the kept
packs, all prefixed with '^', so that the objects in these packs will be
omitted from the resulting pack. The result is that only the objects
filtered out by the first `git pack-objects` command are in the pack
resulting from the second `git pack-objects` command.
As the interactions with kept packs are a bit tricky, a few related
tests are added.
Helped-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Signed-off-by: John Cai <johncai86@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
